To Swerve and Neglect: De-Policing Throughout Today’s Front-Line Police Work

Abstract

This mixed methods study investigates how American and Canadian front-line police officers are responding to policing's new visibility, which implicates citizengenerated mobile device and CCTV footage and concomitant online interconnectivity and social media discourse, and to intensified scrutiny of officers' actions by a more critical public audience. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from 3,660 rank-and-file officers at 23 police agencies across Canada and throughout the State of New York.This study finds that a substantial majority of today's rank-and-file officers in the 23 jurisdictions across both countries (72%) are intentionally reducing, or eliminating, proactive interactions in the community, in response to officers' perceptions that such discretionary initiatives are unnecessarily risky. Little variation was found across location and agency variables (country, region, and police agency size) or across individual officers' demographic variables (gender and race/ethnicity). For individual officers, the decision to practice de-policing and any subsequent intensification in an officer's de-policing practices, is associated with the accumulation of negative policecitizen interactions over an officer's years of front-line police service. Influence from the rank-and-file police subculture also plays a significant role in contributing to these widespread risk-averse practices.For many officers, de-policing is connected with attitudes toward, and avoidance of, individuals perceived as presenting with mental health issues and/or a 'nontraditional' sexual orientation, and, even more strongly, in relation to persons perceived by front-line officers as visible racialized minorities. Implications of the methodology iii and findings are discussed, including those in relation to the author's role as a 'pracademic' researcher, to the current and future situation of policing in North America, and to the author's efforts to enter into public debates regarding today's policing. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis dissertation is dedicated to my father, Roy Gilbert Brown, P.Eng., M.Sc. (Queens 1962), who passed away on 28 May 2019 after a courageous battle with cancer. Some of Chapter Six was written while he rested in hospital and I was at his bedside.My Dad, who was known for his remarkable work ethic, approved of my efforts in this regard and he encouraged me to keep working hard at my journey within academia. He was well versed in the other six chapters, having read them over the past few months after he retired from 60 years of work in structural steel engineering. My Dad told me over the years that he was glad he had declined a scholarship to pursue a PhD in structural engineering at Lehigh University, as he decided instead to work as a practitioner in the field and to marry my mother and have children. However, he also related that he would have liked to have returned to graduate school at some point later in life -a journey upon which he never embarked. Dad, I know you are proud of my accomplishments, as I am of a...

Safety in Cameras? – An Exploratory Study of the Ottawa Public Surveillance (CCTV) Project

“…results are promising in suggesting that increased visibility of police conduct can reduce misconduct, of course we also need to address the cultural and structural issues within policing which reinforce these behaviours. Nor would open-street CCTV proactively address causes for street crime and violence Brown's (2019). results do demonstrate that due to increased visibility, a variety of police behaviour is deterred, including proactive engagement in the community.Theme 3: Fairness -Equitable Treatment Through CCTVThere were a variety of responses in participant discussion concerning fair application of CCTV and whether the technology can treat individuals fairly, all dependent on their varied understanding of CCTV's capabilities and their mental schemas regarding criminality and police.…”

“…The individual may make conscious changes to their behaviour in the surveilled zone to avoid consequences, and then engage in this same behaviour in perceived safe spaces. While Brown's (2013Brown's ( , 2019 Peter's stance towards CCTV was influenced by perceiving CCTV surveillance to be an investigative tool, and not part of a large socio-technical system of social control.…”

Examining the Impact of Body Worn Cameras on Police Officer Memory Following a Critical Incident

“…However, the public has seen similar narratives in the testimonies of accused officers across the globe; and while the police are sanctioned to use force when necessary (Criminal Code, 1985;International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2001), public scrutiny of such events has mounted in recent years (e.g., Bialik, 2017;Patil, 2019). In large part, this increased criticism has paralleled the rise of various recording devices including camera-phones, dash cameras, and closed-circuit television, so much so, that some scholars argue we are experiencing 'de-policing' whereby officers are reluctant to proactively engage in their communities out of fear of reprisal (e.g., Brown, 2019).…”