1974
DOI: 10.1145/585882.585889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To teach Newton's square root algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second implementation, named λ N , computes the square root by using three iterations of the Newton-Raphson method [20,19] which is available from the implementation of Carmack and Lomont. This square root implementation has proved to be effective for applications that allow small errors.…”
Section: Choosing a Proper Square Rootmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second implementation, named λ N , computes the square root by using three iterations of the Newton-Raphson method [20,19] which is available from the implementation of Carmack and Lomont. This square root implementation has proved to be effective for applications that allow small errors.…”
Section: Choosing a Proper Square Rootmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second implementation of LTM, named 'LTM-N', computes the square root by using three iterations of the Newton-Raphson method [13], [12]. More in detail, we use the implementation of Carmack and Lomont.…”
Section: A Choosing the Best Implementation For Ltmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] proposed a mapping function that given a thread id k, it computes the coordinates (a, b), based on the properties of the upper-triangular section of a symmetric matrix. The authors mention that they use Carmack's and Lomont's fast square root approximation (based on the Newton-Raphson approximation algorithm [12]) for speeding up the mapping function. The authors also mention that all approximation errors can be fixed by using only two conditionals statements.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the approximation of √ x using the Newton-Rhapson method [100] cannot be parallelized because each iteration depends on the value of the previous one; there is the issue of time dependence. Such problems do not benefit from parallelism at all and are best solved using a CPU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%