To the study of alien species in the flora of Khakassia

Ebel, Aleksandr L.; Sheremetova, S.A.; Khrustaleva, I.A.; Стрельникова, Татьяна Олеговна; Mikhailova, S.I.; Ebel, T.V.

doi:10.17223/978-5-94621-927-3-2020-49

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both these market values are known to be associated with invasion risk (Haubrock et al 2021c;Kourantidou et al 2021). Indeed, these extensive commerce and goods exchanges within and outside of the country have facilitated the introduction of invasive species, especially pests of plants, phytopathogens and weeds (Maslyakov and Izhevsky 2011;Izhevsky 2013;Ebel et al 2016;Orlova-Bienkowskaja 2016;Karpun 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…the most ecologically impactful, amongst which 60% (mainly plants and insects) are affecting agriculture, forestry and urbanised ecosystems. Vinogradova et al (2009) and Ebel et al (2016) compiled the Black Books of invasive flora by gathering together data on diversity, primary and secondary ranges and ecological hazards of invasive plants aggressively spreading in European and Asian Russia. Kuznetsov (2005) provided the list of invasive insects and discussed their impact on the terrestrial ecosystems of easternmost Russia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Economic costs of biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems in Russia

Kirichenko¹,

Haubrock²,

Cuthbert³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Terrestrial ecosystems, owing to the presence of key socio-economic sectors such as agriculture and forestry, may be particularly economically affected by biological invasions. The present study uses a subset of the recently developed database of global economic costs of biological invasions (InvaCost) to quantify the monetary costs of biological invasions in Russia, the largest country in the world that spans two continents. From 2007 up to 2019, invasions costed the Russian economy at least US$ 51.52 billion (RUB 1.38 trillion, n = 94 cost entries), with the vast majority of these costs based on predictions or extrapolations (US$ 50.86 billion; n = 87) and, therefore, not empirically observed. Most cost entries exhibited low geographic resolution, being split between European and Asian parts of Russia (US$ 44.17 billion; n = 72). Just US$ 7.35 billion (n = 22) was attributed to the European part solely and none to the Asian part. Invasion costs were documented for 72 species and particularly insects (37 species). The empirically-observed costs, summing up to US$ 660 million (n = 7), were reported only for four species: two insects Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire and Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) and two plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. The vast majority of economic costs were related to resource damages and economic losses, with very little reported expenditures on managing invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. In turn, agriculture (US$ 37.42 billion; n = 68) and forestry (US$ 14.0 billion; n = 20) were the most impacted sectors. Overall, we report burgeoning economic costs of invasions in Russia and identify major knowledge gaps, for example, concerning specific habitat types (i.e. aquatic) and management expenditures, as well as for numerous known invasive taxa with no reported economic costs (i.e. vertebrates). Given this massive, largely underestimated economic burden of invasions in Russia, our work is a call for improved reporting of costs nationally and internationally.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic costs of biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems in Russia

Kirichenko¹,

Haubrock²,

Cuthbert³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A high level of genetic diversity in hogweed invasive populations, similar to the native Caucasion population, was found in our research, suggesting reconstruction of their genetic diversity. This high level of genetic diversity, together with data suggesting the increase of some biomorphological traits, the ability to occupy new biotopes [ 65 ], and to hybridize with the native H. sibiricum and H. spondyllium and other introduced hogweeds [ 66 ] reported in the literature, could drive the further expansion of H. sosnowskyi invasion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The sizes of all parts of invasive plants of H. sosnowsky are larger than plants of native populations: the height of the stem (1-1.5 m in the Caucasus and 2-4 m in Europe) and the size of the seeds (in Caucasian species, 9 mm long and 6 mm wide; in Europe, 15 mm long and 8 mm wide). In addition, Caucasian plants grow in forests and meadows, whereas plants of the invaded range are photophilous and mainly found in open habitats [65].…”

Section: Discussion Of the Genetic Diversity Within Populations Of Hogweedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, our results suggest that anthropogenic dispersal may be a major factor contributing to the successful invasion of L. polyphyllus and H. sosnowskyi , together with their individual characteristics, which include environmental tolerance, high fertility, phenotypic plasticity, cold resistance, and the ability to occupy new biotopes. Both species have turned into transformers and supplanted the native species, significantly reducing the diversity of biogeocenoses [ 65 , 68 ]. Thus, these species require further study to successfully control their invasion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Genetic Diversity in Invasive Populations of Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden.

Osipova

Stepanova

Терешонок

et al. 2021

Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In our study, two aggressive-invasive species, Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. from Russia and Ukraine, were investigated. The success in naturalization of both species is associated with human activities, since they have been used in agriculture and floriculture and both have qualities such as environmental tolerance, high fertility and phenotypic plasticity. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of genetic diversity of both species. For Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden., genetic diversity was compared in invasive and native populations. For Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl., the genetic diversity was compared in variety, feral and invasive populations. A genetic diversity was formulated using RAPD, ISSR and REMAP. For Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden., the average genetic diversity within the invasive population was similar (0.432), but slightly less (0.502) than within the native Caucasian population. This may suggest the successful naturalization of invaders and almost complete reconstruction of their genetic diversity. For Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl., the genetic diversity for the invasive population was the highest, with an average of 0.294, while for variety, it was the lowest, with an average of 0.194. The feral population had an intermediate place with an average of 0.248, which could suggest an increase of diversity in the process of naturalization.

show abstract

To the study of alien species in the flora of Khakassia

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Economic costs of biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems in Russia

Economic costs of biological invasions in terrestrial ecosystems in Russia

Genetic Diversity in Invasive Populations of Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About