2021
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2021.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Use or Not to Use Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for the Ideation and Evaluation of Problems to Be Solved with Artificial Intelligence

Abstract: The recent advent of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that surpass humans' problem-solving capabilities has uncovered AIs' great potential to act as new type of problem solvers. Despite decades of analysis, research on organizational problem solving has commonly assumed that the problem solver is essentially human. Yet, it remains unclear how existing knowledge on human problem solving translates to a context with problem-solving machines. To take a first step to better understand this novel context, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a countermeasure to the identified Mode-1 conditions on the subject, the argument here is that contemporary research on the subject, and in extension, the practical adoption of such results, should embrace the central ideas of Mode-2 problem-solving and learning in advanced technology implementations for problem-solving purposes. This infers taking the time to go to the problem, as advocated by Sturm et al (2021), reflect on it properly (Shahlaei and Snis, 2022), test existing assumptions about it, expand the knowledge about it, and hence, expand the knowledge on potential solutions as well as choosing sustainable courses of action (Argyris and Schön, 1997; March, 1991; Mohaghegh and Furlan, 2020; Watzlawick et al , 2011). Although consciously adopting Mode-2 may result in excessive abstractedness (Liedtka, 2020) and a loss of using existing capabilities (Mohaghegh and Größler, 2021), its explorative nature may on the other hand contribute to the generation of new knowledge about potential use of advanced technology implementations for problem-solving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a countermeasure to the identified Mode-1 conditions on the subject, the argument here is that contemporary research on the subject, and in extension, the practical adoption of such results, should embrace the central ideas of Mode-2 problem-solving and learning in advanced technology implementations for problem-solving purposes. This infers taking the time to go to the problem, as advocated by Sturm et al (2021), reflect on it properly (Shahlaei and Snis, 2022), test existing assumptions about it, expand the knowledge about it, and hence, expand the knowledge on potential solutions as well as choosing sustainable courses of action (Argyris and Schön, 1997; March, 1991; Mohaghegh and Furlan, 2020; Watzlawick et al , 2011). Although consciously adopting Mode-2 may result in excessive abstractedness (Liedtka, 2020) and a loss of using existing capabilities (Mohaghegh and Größler, 2021), its explorative nature may on the other hand contribute to the generation of new knowledge about potential use of advanced technology implementations for problem-solving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is grounded in the scoping review findings showing a lack of empirical anchoring of tested algorithms and models (see Table 1), as well as the identified solution focus of the field. By including more empirically anchored studies, both the initial and implementation phases of problem-solving processes could be further understood, as advocated by Sturm et al (2021) and Joksimovic et al (2023). Further research on empirically anchored applications may also support manufacturing industries in understanding added value of advanced technology, as commented by Burggräf et al (2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to research by IDC 4 , 40% of Digital Transformation will be related to AI, while Accenture 5 predicts that 80% of finance accounting tasks will be automated in the upcoming years.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present moment, there is no widely recognized model, structure, or standard for coming up with AI applications in Project Management. A researcher has developed a new method to identify use cases given the technology and business problem [4] but not specifically for the Project Management domain. As of today, AI application in Project Management can be seen as still in the infancy stages.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%