1998
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To what degree does the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) correctly identify DSM‐IV disorders? Testing validity issues in a clinical sample

Abstract: This paper compares diagnoses of the DSM-IV algorithms of the computer-assisted version of the MunichComposite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
184
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
184
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the CIDI is essentially a self-report instrument (Eaton et al, 2000). Both the validity (Haro et al, 2006;Reed et al, 1998) and the test-retest reliability have been established, showing that the CIDI provides valid diagnoses for almost all non-psychotic disorders with good to excellent kappa coefficients for most diagnostic sections (Wittchen, 1994) .…”
Section: Diagnostic Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the CIDI is essentially a self-report instrument (Eaton et al, 2000). Both the validity (Haro et al, 2006;Reed et al, 1998) and the test-retest reliability have been established, showing that the CIDI provides valid diagnoses for almost all non-psychotic disorders with good to excellent kappa coefficients for most diagnostic sections (Wittchen, 1994) .…”
Section: Diagnostic Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DIA-X/M-CIDI allows for the standardised assessment and objective analyses of symptoms, syndromes and diagnoses of over 30 diagnoses grouped for the purpose of the present papers in six major groups (i.e., anxiety, PTSD, mood disorders) according to the criteria of DSM-IV-TR. The incremental reliability and validity of the CIDI lifetime and current assessment has been established [12][13][14][15]. The CIDI was supplemented by additional modules to determine incident disorders, to assess further relevant military characteristics, trauma/event descriptions and questions regarding help seeking and treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of measurement appears to be particularly critical suggesting that studies relying on cost effective and time saving self-report measures have typically higher rates as compared to the few available studies using clinical diagnostic measures. The DSM-IV criteria require differential diagnostic considerations and the clinical and instrumental standard methods for such differential diagnostic considerations are established [12][13][14][15]. From a clinical diagnostic perspective, self-report approaches have also the disadvantage that they do neither allow the derivation of clinical diagnoses nor the consideration of differential clinical diagnostic rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric properties of the CIDI were found to range from acceptable to very good (Wittchen, 1994 ;Lachner et al 1998 ;Reed et al 1998). The interviewers (n=24, mostly psychologists who had already worked on other CIDI studies) had received a 3-day CIDI training session for the GHS-MHS and CIDI refresher courses every 3 months throughout the field period.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%