2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco Control as an LGBTQ+ Issue: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Recommendations from LGBTQ+ Community Leaders

Abstract: Tobacco companies use price discounts, including coupons and rebates, to market their products. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities are targeted by these marketing strategies, contributing to inequitably high tobacco use. Some localities have adopted policies restricting tobacco price discounts; for successful implementation, community buy-in is crucial. From July–October 2018, Equality California staff conducted semi-structured interviews with seven participants in Los Angeles,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings expand upon limited work regarding a range of factors that are related to cannabis use among SM relative to heterosexual individuals, including cannabis-related marketing exposure 34 and harm perceptions. 26 They are consistent with those found among adolescent and young adult samples 34,35 and found in the tobacco literature, 60,61 which demonstrate that SM young adults report greater tobacco marketing exposure due to targeted marketing efforts from the tobacco industry (e.g., at LGBTQ+ community events). SM females’ lower cannabis-related harm perceptions relative to heterosexual females may be due to multiple factors, including: (a) higher rates of recent cannabis marketing exposure (as marketing efforts often include health claims and few health warnings 62 -64 ), particularly in places like Oklahoma with high levels of cannabis marketing exposure 43,44 ; and (b) greater use within LGBTQ+ social networks, which may impact risk perceptions via social norms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Findings expand upon limited work regarding a range of factors that are related to cannabis use among SM relative to heterosexual individuals, including cannabis-related marketing exposure 34 and harm perceptions. 26 They are consistent with those found among adolescent and young adult samples 34,35 and found in the tobacco literature, 60,61 which demonstrate that SM young adults report greater tobacco marketing exposure due to targeted marketing efforts from the tobacco industry (e.g., at LGBTQ+ community events). SM females’ lower cannabis-related harm perceptions relative to heterosexual females may be due to multiple factors, including: (a) higher rates of recent cannabis marketing exposure (as marketing efforts often include health claims and few health warnings 62 -64 ), particularly in places like Oklahoma with high levels of cannabis marketing exposure 43,44 ; and (b) greater use within LGBTQ+ social networks, which may impact risk perceptions via social norms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“… 27 , 28 Tobacco companies, attuned to the stigmatization and legal and social restrictions faced by members of the SGM community, have been successful in framing tobacco use as a personal right and freedom. 29–31 Conversely, by stigmatizing cigarette smoking, prevention and cessation interventions may inadvertently re-stigmatize SGM people, contributing to continued cigarette use. Thus, to mitigate SGM cigarette smoking disparities, prevention and cessation interventions may need to acknowledge SGM young peoples’ experiences with minority stress and the myriad reasons SGM use tobacco products, without stigmatizing the act of cigarette smoking itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of TID campaigns used in conjunction with consciousness raising to reduce tobacco use disparities in LGBTQ and Black/African American communities warrants further study. But as these communities are heterogeneous and intersecting, stakeholders within these minority groups emphasize the need for community-engaged, tailored approaches (Acosta-Deprez et al, 2021; Mills et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%