2011
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2011.586801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco control in the EU-15: the role of member states and the European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is between legislature and executive in policy development, which has varied. In the earlier days of the late 1990s, parliament took the lead although the executive quickly followed Ireland confirms previous general findings that tobacco control legislation does not fit the general European 'party government' model in terms of generating party conflict (Cairney et al 2012;Studlar et al 2011;Toshkov 2013). …”
Section: Institutionssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The first is between legislature and executive in policy development, which has varied. In the earlier days of the late 1990s, parliament took the lead although the executive quickly followed Ireland confirms previous general findings that tobacco control legislation does not fit the general European 'party government' model in terms of generating party conflict (Cairney et al 2012;Studlar et al 2011;Toshkov 2013). …”
Section: Institutionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…She utilises four policies (non-smoking areas, advertising and promotion, health warnings, and cessation support) and finds a similar pattern to Studlar et al (2011) with some variations. Ireland made consistent incremental progress in the 1990s and early 2000s, but then doubled its score in 2004 to become the European leader until 2007 when the United Kingdom exceeded it.…”
Section: Tobacco Free Ireland: Report Of the Tobacco Policy Review Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations