Tobacco demand, delay discounting, and smoking topography among smokers with and without psychopathology

Abstract

Introduction Tobacco demand (i.e., relative value attributed to a given reinforcer) and delay discounting (i.e., relative preference for smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards) are two behavioral economic processes that are linked to the progression of problematic substance use. These processes have not been studied among those with psychopathology, a vulnerable group of smokers. The current study examined differences in tobacco demand and delay discounting, and their association with smoking topography among smokers with (n=43) and without (n=64) past-year psychopathology. Method Adult daily smokers (n = 107, Mage = 43.5; SD = 9.7) participated in a study on “smoking behavior.” Past-year psychological disorders were assessed via a clinician-administered diagnostic assessment. All subjects participated in an ad libitum smoking trial and then completed an assessment of delay discounting (Monetary Choice Questionnaire) and tobacco demand (Cigarette Purchase Task) approximately 45–60 minutes post-smoking. Results Smokers with psychopathology, compared to those without, had significantly higher demand intensity and maximum expenditure on tobacco (Omax), but did not differ on other demand indices or delay discounting. Smokers with psychopathology had shorter average inter-puff intervals and shorter time to cigarette completion than smokers without psychopathology. Tobacco demand and delay discounting measures were significantly intercorrelated among smokers with psychopathology, but not those without. Both behavioral economic measures were associated with specific aspects of smoking topography in smokers with psychopathology. Discussion The association between tobacco demand and delay discounting is evident among smokers with psychopathology and both measures were most consistently related to smoking behavior.

The condom purchase task: A hypothetical demand method for evaluating sexual health decision‐making

“…The average pack price in the United States is approximately $7 making average single cigarette costs $0.35. Some P max estimates for cigarettes from purchase task studies have exceeded this value consistent with the results observed here (e.g., P max greater than $1 USD [or equivalent] for full nicotine or typical brand cigarettes; Farris, Aston, Abrantes, & Zvolensky, ; Higgins et al, ; MacKillop et al, ). One of the few studies to report a P max ($0.25) more closely approximating market price used a high‐resolution evaluation and included the price/pack next to each price/cigarette (MacKillop et al, ).…”

Characteristic Human Individual Puffing Profiles Can Generate More TNCO than ISO and Health Canada Regimes on Smoking Machine When the Same Brand Is Smoked

“…Since 2000, Chen et al published a study wherein a total puffing volume of 360 mL/cigarette was determined [22], i.e., the lowest value we could identify. This is almost four times lower than the 1289 mL/cigarette calculated with the data from Ross et al and Farris et al [23,24], i.e., the highest total puffing volume reported. The variation in puffing topography data published thus far may be explained by differences between cigarette brands as well as by inter-individual and intra-individual differences.…”

Smoking Topography among Korean Smokers: Intensive Smoking Behavior with Larger Puff Volume and Shorter Interpuff Interval

“…As we mentioned above, such variations may be a function of sex, nicotine yield, cigarette type (flavored vs. none flavored) ethnicity, etc. [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”