2018
DOI: 10.14485/hbpr.5.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco-free School Policy in Maharashtra, India: A Qualitative Exploration of Implementation Facilitators and Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the question remains as to why this intervention only facilitated 37.8% in attaining all TFS criteria. While this study did not examine the barriers to adherence with all TFS criteria, a previous qualitative study revealed factors such as disinterested teachers, lack of ownership by the school management and community norms surrounding tobacco use as barriers to fulfilment of TFS criteria, and that teachers, who successfully made their school tobacco-free, were driven by a personal mission of tobacco-eradication or drive for social change 25 . Future teacher training will need to incorporate methods to reinforce and sustain this sense of purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the question remains as to why this intervention only facilitated 37.8% in attaining all TFS criteria. While this study did not examine the barriers to adherence with all TFS criteria, a previous qualitative study revealed factors such as disinterested teachers, lack of ownership by the school management and community norms surrounding tobacco use as barriers to fulfilment of TFS criteria, and that teachers, who successfully made their school tobacco-free, were driven by a personal mission of tobacco-eradication or drive for social change 25 . Future teacher training will need to incorporate methods to reinforce and sustain this sense of purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Despite the existing TFS policy measures since 2009, government schools in the state have struggled with understanding and implementing tobacco-free schools 24 . Salaam Mumbai Foundation (SMF), a non-governmental organization (NGO) that works to prevent tobacco use among children, collaborated with the State Education Department to train teachers to implement the TFS policy 25,26 . This study used a post-only quasi-experimental design to gather information on the fulfillment of the 11 TFS criteria ( Table 1) from randomly selected upper-primary (5th to 7th grade) and secondary (8th to 10th grade) government schools in four districts in Maharashtra.…”
Section: Study Setting and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Assam, with very low compliance with 6b (3%) despite collaboration with the civil societies, was reported due to easy access to tobacco products to the youth because of their sale near EIs on carts,[ 33 ] in tuck shops, etc. [ 23 , 36 ] Also, it could be due to (1) vendors either not displaying the signboards of “No Sale to the Minors”[ 34 , 36 - 38 ] or these not confirming the age of the children,[ 23 , 41 ] (2) an overall increased density of shops,[ 42 ] (3) inability to prohibit new establishments,[ 43 ] or to displace the old tobacco outlets,[ 36 ] and (4) the porous state borders[ 37 ] encouraging easy availability of the illicit products through the grey market. [ 36 , 44 ] It was also attributed to the ignorance of the EI heads of the law[ 45 ] or their inability to challan the violators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TFI : Nationally, compliance has been the poorest at 26.81% [ Table 3 ]. Poorer compliance in the states like UP, MP, and Rajasthan was the result of the indifference of the education and health department towards its stricter enforcement provision of law[ 36 , 43 ] and the inability of the State Tobacco Control Cell (STCC) to reach the schools to implement tobacco-free schools. [ 43 ] Contrary to this, its higher compliance in Kerala (76.3%) was attributed to the implementation of Section 6b since 2011–12 itself [ Figures 2 and 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study interviewees emphasised that improved enforcement and implementation require collaborative multisectoral partnerships, which include schools, parents, officials at all levels (national, state and district), local representatives, civil society and government health and non-health departments. The multistakeholder partnerships have been observed to be beneficial in reducing tobacco use in many parts of the world 17 86 87. For instance, in New Zealand almost all educational institutes that have declared themselves 100% tobacco-free reported collaboration with external providers 88…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%