Tobacco Nitrate and Free Radical Levels in the Mainstream Smoke of US Cigarette Brands

Abstract

Tobacco nitrate levels have been known to impact the levels of toxicants such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) produced during smoking. Recent work in our group showed that the intrinsic nitrate levels in individual tobacco varieties also have a large influence on the formation of gas-phase (GP) free radicals in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes produced with a single tobacco variety. As tobacco nitrate content is a potential target for future regulatory policies, we investigated whether the levels of GP free radicals in the smoke from commercially available cigarettes is also dependent on the nitrate content in the corresponding tobacco blends. GP and particulate-phase (PP) free radical yields in mainstream smoke produced from 25 popular US cigarette brands were measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. For each brand, we also measured levels of the TSNAs NNN (N′-nitrosonornicotine) and NNK (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone) via HPLC-MS and the nicotine content via GC-FID. Our results show that the intrinsic nitrate levels varied >15-fold and GP radicals varied 4-fold among the 25 brands tested. The GP radicals were correlated with intrinsic nitrate levels (r = 0.87, p < 0.001). NNK and NNN levels varied >8-fold and 12-fold, respectively. We found that NNK was moderately correlated to nitrate content (r = 0.42, p = 0.03) while the NNN was strongly correlated to the nitrate content (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Nicotine levels varied the least (<3-fold) but showed a moderate negative correlation to nitrate content (r = −0.47, p = 0.02). No statistically significant correlation was observed between nicotine and TSNA levels in mainstream smoke. Overall, this demonstrates that the nitrate content of tobacco blends used in US cigarette brands impacts toxicant output in the mainstream smoke, although other proprietary variables (total ventilation, additives, filter type, etc.) may also modulate these results.