Tobacco use and low-income African Americans: Policy implications

Lee, Doohee; Turner, Nannette; Burns, Jennifer L.; Lee, Tongsoo

doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.002

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies assessed for SHSe at public places such as bars, clubs, or indoor places of leisure (Chen et al, 2009;Kalkhoran et al, 2013;Vançelik et al, 2009;Wilson-Frederick et al, 2011). Some studies asked research participants to respond whether they had been exposed to SHS at all or to rate themselves as rarely or frequently exposed (Andreeva et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2009;Helgason et al, 2004;Hopenhayn et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2007;Okoli & Khara, 2014;Şahbaz et al, 2008).…”

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Twelve studies from our review examined the association between SHSe and smoking status (see Table 1), of which ten examined the relationship between SHSe and smoking identity and two studies examined frequency of smoking (Darling & Reeder, 2003;Kalkhoran et al, 2013). Seven studies examined data from adult populations (Homish et al, 2011;Hopenhayn et al, 2013;Kalkhoran et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2007;Manzoli et al, 2005;Skorge et al, 2007;Twose et al, 2007) and five examined data from youth (Darling & Reeder, 2003;Glover et al, 2011;Hong et al, 2013;Seo et al, 2009;Tyc et al, 2004). Six studies found that SHSe at home was associated with smoking identity; (Darling & Reeder, 2003;Hopenhayn et al, 2013;Kalkhoran et al, 2013;Manzoli et al, 2005;Seo et al, 2009;Skorge et al, 2007) and of the four studies examining SHSe in vehicles, all but one (Homish et al, 2011) found that SHSe in vehicles is associated with smoking identity.…”

Section: Secondhand Smoke and Smoking Statusmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Twelve studies (34.3%) examined the association between SHSe and smoking status; (Darling & Reeder, 2003;Glover et al, 2011;Homish et al, 2011;Hong, Kam, & Kim, 2013;Hopenhayn et al, 2013;Kalkhoran, Neilands, & Ling, 2013;Lee et al, 2007;Manzoli et al, 2005;Seo, Bodde, & Torabi, 2009;Skorge et al, 2007;Twose et al, 2007;Tyc, et al, 2004) seven (20.0%) examined the association between SHSe and smoking susceptibility; (Chen, Huang, & Chao, 2009;Guindon, Georgiades, & Boyle, 2008;Kalkhoran et al, 2013;Racicot, McGrath, & O'Loughlin, 2011;Schultz, Nowatzki, & Ronson, 2013;Veeranki et al, 2013; Yang, Leatherdale, & Ahmed, 2011) five (14.3%) examined the…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Lee et al (2007) Adult African Americans(USA) Cross-sectional analysis (N = 388) SHS exposure: Based on questionnaire (No vs. Yes).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation

Okoli

Kodet

2015

Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Secondhand Smoke and Smoking Statusmentioning

confidence: 98%

mentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Lee et al (2007) Adult African Americans(USA) Cross-sectional analysis (N = 388) SHS exposure: Based on questionnaire (No vs. Yes).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation

Okoli

Kodet

2015

Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Tobacco industry marketing strategies include distributing discount coupons for cigarettes with food stamps and discount offers at point-of-sale, offering free cigarettes to service providers that serve populations disproportionately affected by tobacco use, and creating product advertisements that are directed toward low-income populations (Apollonio & Malone, 2005; Brown-Johnson, England, Glantz, & Ling, 2014; John, Cheney, & Azad, 2009). Such strategies have been shown to be associated with increased tobacco use among low-income populations (Cornelius, Driezen, Fong, Chaloupka, Hyland, Bansal-Travers et al, 2013; Lee, Turner, Burns, & Lee, 2007). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differential use of other tobacco products among current and former cigarette smokers by income level

Vijayaraghavan

Pierce

White

et al. 2014

Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the declining sales of cigarettes, the tobacco industry has been promoting other forms of combustible and smokeless tobacco to current and former cigarette smokers. Exposure to the promotion of tobacco products has been shown to vary by income level. We combined the 2006 through 2011 National Surveys on Drug Use and health to compare the prevalence and patterns of other tobacco use (cigar, snuff, and chewing tobacco) between current and former cigarette smokers by income level. Other tobacco use was minimal among females and among male non-smokers. Approximately a third of both current and former male cigarette smokers reported past-year other tobacco use. Overall, current smokers were more likely than former smokers to have used cigars (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.69, 95% CI 1.50–1.92) or snuff (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28) in the past year. The association of smoking status with other tobacco use differed by income level (interaction term p value < 0.001). Among lower-income groups, current smokers were more likely to use cigars and snuff compared to former smokers. Among the highest income group, former smokers were just as likely to use smokeless tobacco as current smokers. The differing patterns of use of other tobacco between current and former smokers by income level highlight a need for studies to understand the motivations for the use of these products and their role in smoking cessation.

show abstract

Application of a CBPR Framework to Inform a Multi‐level Tobacco Cessation Intervention in Public Housing Neighborhoods

Andrews

Tingen

Jarriel³

et al. 2011

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

African American women in urban, high poverty neighborhoods have high rates of smoking, difficulties with quitting, and disproportionate tobacco-related health disparities. Prior research utilizing conventional “outsider driven” interventions targeted to individuals has failed to show effective cessation outcomes. This paper describes the application of a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework to inform a culturally situated, ecological based, multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods. The CBPR framework encompasses problem identification, planning and feasibility/pilot testing, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination. There have been multiple partners in this process including public housing residents, housing authority administrators, community health workers, tenant associations, and academic investigators. The advisory process has evolved from an initial small steering group to our current institutional community advisory boards. Our decade-long CBPR journey produced design innovations, promising preliminary outcomes, and a full-scaled implementation study in two states. Challenges include sustaining engagement with evolving study partners, maintaining equity and power in the partnerships, and long-term sustainability of the intervention. Implications include applicability of the framework with other CBPR partnerships, especially scaling up evolutionary grassroots involvement to multi-regional partnerships.

show abstract

Tobacco use and low-income African Americans: Policy implications

Cited by 14 publications

References 26 publications

A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation

A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation

Differential use of other tobacco products among current and former cigarette smokers by income level

Application of a CBPR Framework to Inform a Multi‐level Tobacco Cessation Intervention in Public Housing Neighborhoods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About