1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1236(83)90010-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toeplitz and Wiener-Hopf determinants with piecewise continuous symbols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2,4,44,45,50] and [18] for more on the history of the question) The latter constant was obtained by A. Budylin and V. Buslaev as a corollary to their main result in [4], namely the asymptotics of the resolvent of the kernel γK sin (λ, µ). Formula (1.17) also follows from the general theorem of E. Basor and H. Widom concerning the determinants of Toeplitz integral operators with piecewise continuous symbols [3].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[2,4,44,45,50] and [18] for more on the history of the question) The latter constant was obtained by A. Budylin and V. Buslaev as a corollary to their main result in [4], namely the asymptotics of the resolvent of the kernel γK sin (λ, µ). Formula (1.17) also follows from the general theorem of E. Basor and H. Widom concerning the determinants of Toeplitz integral operators with piecewise continuous symbols [3].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such results have often been investigated before; see for example [2,14]. However, all the results known thus far use the fact that H(a)H(b) is of trace class.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First we will show that the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of T n (b − 1) tends to 0 as n → ∞; hence the regularized determinant tends to 1. Second, we show that Tr T n (b − 1) − C (2) tends to 0 as n → ∞. Then (1.14) follows by (3.7) and (3.8).…”
Section: Corollary 33mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inequality (1.11) for x lying along lattice lines follows from earlier work [1] on Toeplitz determinants for piecewise smooth symbols. These results allow for a larger range of δ in (1.11) than [11] does.…”
Section: Relation To Dimersmentioning
confidence: 89%