Together we lose or gain: Ongoing and enduring impacts of collaboration in episodic memory of emotional DRM lists

Nie, Aiqing; Li, Minye; Li, Mengsi; Xiao, Yueyue; Wang, Siyi

doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03940-z

Cited by 7 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a typical research paradigm of collaborative memory, participants first study a list of items separately and then take a recall test either individually or collaboratively. Research adopting this paradigm has confirmed that people working collaboratively remember more items than individuals working alone (Barnier et al, 2018;Harris et al, 2017;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022. Such findings are in line with the commonsensical saying "strength in numbers. "…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 72%

“…Scenarios involving at least two people remembering together are termed collaborative memory (Maswood et al, 2019;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022. In a typical research paradigm of collaborative memory, participants first study a list of items separately and then take a recall test either individually or collaboratively.…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the collaborative groups, participants are informed to retrieve collaboratively. The nominal group is equal in size to the collaborative group, and members are randomly assigned to retrieve individually (Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Maswood et al, 2019;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022.…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Taking a group of dyads as an example, if one participant recalls Items A, B, and C, and the other participant recalls Items A, D, and E, the pooled nonredundant items are A, B, C, D, and E. Comparisons between collaborative and nominal groups reveal that collaboration can both facilitate and inhibit memory. Regarding the quantity of correctly remembered items, collaborative groups perform worse than nominal groups, and this difference is termed collaborative inhibition, a detrimental effect (Barber et al, 2015;Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, , 2022. On the contrary, the number of errors is significantly lower in collaborative versus nominal groups, and this beneficial effect is called error pruning (Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022Rossi-Arnaud et al, 2018).…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the quantity of correctly remembered items, collaborative groups perform worse than nominal groups, and this difference is termed collaborative inhibition, a detrimental effect (Barber et al, 2015;Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, , 2022. On the contrary, the number of errors is significantly lower in collaborative versus nominal groups, and this beneficial effect is called error pruning (Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022Rossi-Arnaud et al, 2018).…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Nie¹,

Deng²

2023

ACP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing collaborative memory research has shown statistically significant detrimental and beneficial effects (i.e., collaborative inhibition, error pruning, and post-collaborative memory benefit). However, it remains unknown yet whether they are modulated by stimulus emotionality of adjacent stimuli and whether they would differ in distinct memory tasks (item memory vs. source memory). To address these issues, the current study adopted the emotional timeout procedure, where participants individually studied a series of triplets (a preceding neutral word, a modulator word of taboo, nontaboo negative, neutral, or positive emotionality, and a following neutral word) displayed in red or green, and three recall sessions and a surprise recognition test was conducted afterwards. Results revealed reliable beneficial effects of collaboration. (a) The error pruning was reliably observed within ongoing and lasting collaboration in item memory tasks while it faded away post-collaboration in source memory conditions. (b) The post-collaborative memory benefit was confirmed in all word positions. It occurred in taboo, neutral, and positive words for modulators of different emotionality, while that of the preceding and following neutral words were insensitive to the emotionality of the modulator. The effect was only present in item memory, offering compelling evidence for dual-process models. (c) Collaboration facilitated the picked-up effect and the formation of shared memory. However, the detrimental effect of collaborative inhibition was absent in both memory tasks. These findings demonstrated that the mechanisms of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSDH) took effect under the emotional timeout procedure to a certain degree.

show abstract

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Nie¹,

Deng²

2023

ACP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Collaborative memory: A selective review

Rajaram,

Greeley,

Peña

2024

Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sensitivity of late ERP old/new effects in source memory to self-referential encoding focus and stimulus emotionality

Nie

Zhou

Xiao

2023

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Together we lose or gain: Ongoing and enduring impacts of collaboration in episodic memory of emotional DRM lists

Cited by 7 publications

References 79 publications

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Collaborative memory: A selective review

Sensitivity of late ERP old/new effects in source memory to self-referential encoding focus and stimulus emotionality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About