Summary.Hypoglycaemic sulphonamides stimulate net uptake of 45Ca+ + and insulin release in isolated pancreatic islets. These effects are antagonized by organic calcium-antagonists (e.g. suloctidil). In an artificial system, hypoglycaemic sulphonamides, such as gliclazide, stimulate the translocation of calcium into or across a hydrophobic immiscible domain, a process enhanced by the antibiotic ionophore A 23187 and antagonized by suloctidil. In this artificial system, the A23187-mediated process of calcium countertransport is stimulated by gliclazide and inhibited by diazoxide. It is postulated that the insulinotropic action of hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic sulphonamides is primarily attributable to the ionophoretic action of these drugs.Key words: Hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas, diazoxide, calcium, insulin release, ionophores, organic calcium antagonists.Hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas stimulate insulin release from the pancreatic B-cell. The mechanism of such an insulinotropic effect is poorly understood [1]. Within the framework of current concepts concerning the cytophysiology of insulin release [2], three primary sites of action could be proposed to account for the insulinotropic action of sulphonylureas: a facilitation of nutrient metabolism, an interference with cyclic AMP synthesis or breakdown, or a remodelling of ionic fluxes in the B-cell.Biochemical studies, reviewed elsewhere [1, 3], do not support the first of these 3 hypotheses.Although hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas were occasionally claimed to activate adenylate cyclase [4] and repeatedly found to inhibit phosphodiesterase [5][6][7] in islet homogenates, the relevance of the latter finding may be questioned since sulphonylureas apparently do not penetrate the B-cell beyond the plasma membrane [1]. A drug-induced increase in the cyclic AMP content of intact islets could be secondary to a cytosolic accumulation of Ca 2+ [8].The third hypothesis, namely that of a primary action of hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas upon ionic movements, may involve two distinct mechanisms. First, sulphonylureas may cause a decrease in K § conductance [9,10] leading to subsequent cell depolarization and gating of voltage-dependent Ca 2+ channels; however, under suitable conditions, tolbutamide is able to stimulate Ca 2+ influx and insulin release without decreasing K + conductance [11]. Second, sulphonylureas may directly interfere with an ionophoretic modality of Ca transport across the B-cell plasma membrane [12][13][14][15]. This hypothesis has recently been scrutinized in great detail [16][17][18].The present report documents some selected experimental findings in support of the ionophoretic hypothesis.
Methodological ConsiderationsInsulin release was measured in groups of 8 pancreatic islets, removed from fed female albino rats and incubated for 60 min at 37~ in a bicarbonate-buffered solution [19]. The net uptake of 45Ca 2+ by the islets was measured over 90 min incubation, followed by repeated washes of the islets in order to remove extracellular radioactivity [20].Two...