2019
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1644290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance and remedial potential of trees submitted to atrazine and sulfentrazone in the rhizosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dicotyledonous plants are somewhat more sensitive than monocotyledonous plants, (Brain and Hoberg 2016;Dalton and Boutin 2010;White and Boutin 2007) but not to the extent that atrazine could be considered selective. In the laboratory and field, atrazine does not typically cause rapid mortality (e.g., the complete loss of all viability with no potential for recovery) in terrestrial or riparian plants at environmentally realistic exposures and durations (Brain et al 2019;Brain and Hoberg 2016;Dos Santos et al 2020;Wang et al 2015;White and Boutin 2007) and, as discussed above (Section 2.4), plants can recover. Also noted in Section 2.2 above, there is no evidence of bioaccumulation of atrazine in terrestrial plants beyond general uptake as would be expected for an herbicide with its physicochemical properties that result in transport in the xylem with minimal systemic transport when applied to leaves.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dicotyledonous plants are somewhat more sensitive than monocotyledonous plants, (Brain and Hoberg 2016;Dalton and Boutin 2010;White and Boutin 2007) but not to the extent that atrazine could be considered selective. In the laboratory and field, atrazine does not typically cause rapid mortality (e.g., the complete loss of all viability with no potential for recovery) in terrestrial or riparian plants at environmentally realistic exposures and durations (Brain et al 2019;Brain and Hoberg 2016;Dos Santos et al 2020;Wang et al 2015;White and Boutin 2007) and, as discussed above (Section 2.4), plants can recover. Also noted in Section 2.2 above, there is no evidence of bioaccumulation of atrazine in terrestrial plants beyond general uptake as would be expected for an herbicide with its physicochemical properties that result in transport in the xylem with minimal systemic transport when applied to leaves.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The values of the analyzed variables were transformed into percentages in comparison to the control treatment ---------------------------------------------mg dm -3 --------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------% ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------cmol c dm -3 ----------------------------------------------------------6.1 1.17 5.0 2.2 0.0 2.50 (without herbicide) for standardization, as they are different species (Santos et al, 2020). The assumptions of homogeneity of variance and normality of residuals were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and O'Neill-Mathews tests, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater rhizospheric colonization by mycorrhizal fungi in I. edulis can be explained by the ability of this species to tolerate the herbicide and the phytoremediation of soils with sulfentrazone residues (Santos et al, 2020). Some microorganisms can use the compounds of this degradation as an energy source for their growth and, consequently, increase colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roots, stems, and leaves of T.ciliata can be utilized as medication and have successful restorative properties [14][15][16]. The monetary worth of this variety is quite high, and it is generally utilized and has extraordinary potential for advancement and utilization [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%