“…Previous studies in animal models have proposed mechanisms by which autologous and allogenic HSCT inhibit the progression of type 1 diabetes, including the suggestions that: (i) the myeloablation associated with conditioning regimens may reduce peripheral self-reactive T cells ("immune elimination") and reverse the diabetogenic autoimmune response, thereby halting the process of islet b-cell destruction; 26 (ii) HSCT reconstitutes a new adaptive immune system with a naı¨ve T cell pool, which would not contribute to the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes in the absence of the environmental triggers; 26 (iii) infusion of HSCs following conditioning may modulate the peripheral immunocompetent cells ("immune resetting") and, when exposed to environmental triggers, such as infections, the reconstituted immunocompetent cells present a more self-tolerant phenotype characterized by increased numbers of CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + T cells, 29,30 thereby shifting the balance from immune destruction to immune tolerance by altering cytokine and b-cell antigen-specific humoral responses; 28,31 and (iv) HSCs may preserve islet b-cell function by stimulating b-cell regeneration, enhancing neovascularization, promoting the differentiation of progenitor cells into b-cells, and protecting b-cells against apoptosis. [32][33][34] Notably, although allogenic HSCT is associated with an increased risk of developing GVHD, it still has some advantages over autologous HSCT. The replacement of the diabetic lymphohematopoietic system with cell populations derived from theoretically diabetesresistant donors and the introduction of donor-specific tolerance may reduce the risk of the reoccurrence of autoimmunity.…”