2013
DOI: 10.2478/johh-2013-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance of canola to drought and salinity stresses in terms of root water uptake model parameters

Abstract: Canola (Brassica napus) is cultivated for oil as a biofuel crop. Few quantitative data concerning its tolerance to abiotic stresses has been presented. We evaluated the tolerances of canola to drought and salinity stresses in terms of parameter values in a macroscopic root water uptake model. We conducted an experiment using nine columns with two plants in each: three columns were under drought stresses, another three were under saline stress and others provided potential transpiration. Two soil moisture and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some crops cope well under conditions where soil generally imparts water stress (Yanagawa & Fujimaki 2013). Huzsvai & Rajkai (2009) demonstrated the adaptability of maize plants to water deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some crops cope well under conditions where soil generally imparts water stress (Yanagawa & Fujimaki 2013). Huzsvai & Rajkai (2009) demonstrated the adaptability of maize plants to water deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results for the pairs of cases with the same retention curve (Cases 1 and 4, Cases 2 and 3) were similar (compare Figures 5 and 6). The suction required to deplete VWCs during normal growth has been reported to be about 1000 cm [30]; therefore, we considered that Case 1 (600 cm) and Case 4 (700 cm) provided the more realistic values of h 50 for application in HYDRUS-1D, even though the RMSEs of Cases 2 and 3 were lower. The common factor for Cases 1 and 4 was the use of the measured retention curve.…”
Section: Optimization Of H 50 and Simulation Of Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VWC for all the depths and treatments decreased with time due to evapotranspirational water loss (Fig. 4) (Huzsvai & Rajkai 2009;Yanagawa & Fujimaki 2013); however, values differed depending on depth and the treatment method used. The difference in values of VWC between the two treatments became more pronounced from 5 days after flooding at 11.5 cm and 27.0 cm depths, and from 2 days after flooding at a depth of 43.0 cm, where the values of VWC for the CC-FLD treatment decreased more extensively in comparison with those of the noCC-FLD treatment.…”
Section: Environmental Conditions and Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%