2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance of geometric distortions in infant's face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was true not only for two-dimensional linear transformations, but also when the image was distorted by onedimensional linear transformations. These findings are consistent with previous studies, both in adults (Hole, 2002;Frowd et al 2014) and infants (Yamashita et al, 2013), as well as non-human primates (Taubert & Parr, 2011). However, when the face shape was changed by substantial non-linear transformation in Experiment 1, both accuracy and reaction times were attenuated.…”
Section: The Effect Of Linear and Non-linear Changes On Face Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This was true not only for two-dimensional linear transformations, but also when the image was distorted by onedimensional linear transformations. These findings are consistent with previous studies, both in adults (Hole, 2002;Frowd et al 2014) and infants (Yamashita et al, 2013), as well as non-human primates (Taubert & Parr, 2011). However, when the face shape was changed by substantial non-linear transformation in Experiment 1, both accuracy and reaction times were attenuated.…”
Section: The Effect Of Linear and Non-linear Changes On Face Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Can this be explained as a learned ability, acquired through experience with printed images? Although this possibility is hard to definitively rule out, recent reports of infant and nonhuman primates' ability to recognize spatially distorted images reduce its likelihood ( Yamashita, Kanazawa, & Yamaguchi, 2014;Taubert & Parr, 2010). The asymmetry between the effects of horizontal and vertical within-axis distance ratios also challenges this idea.…”
Section: Compressed Faces As An Epiphenomenon Of Tolerance To Depth Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each child tested with a familiar teacher had known their teacher for a minimum of 3 months (with no difference in performance between children who had known their teacher for 3 versus 9 months), it is possible that children would show adult-like tolerance to variability for their caregiver's face due to children's early advantage with these faces. Newborn infants show a preference for their mother's face (Pascalis, De Schonen, Morton, Deruelle, & Fabre-Grenet, 1995;Bushnell, 2001), and older infants show adult-like patterns of recognition for their mother's face, such as recognition despite geometric distortions (Yamashita, Kanazawa & Yamaguchi, 2014) and masking of external features (Bartrip, Morton, & de Schonen, 2001), as well as inversion effects (Balas et al 2009). In short, representations for caregivers might be more robust than for other familiar faces due to them being highly overlearned (Tong & Nakayama, 1999).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%