2023
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v15n10p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance of White Bean to Tiafenacil Herbicide Mixtures and Control of Multiple Herbicide-Resistant Horseweed With Tiafenacil Herbicide Mixtures

Nader Soltani,
Christy Shropshire,
Peter H. Sikkema

Abstract: There is limited information on the tolerance of white bean to tiafenacil herbicide mixtures applied preplant (PP) and the efficacy of tiafenacil herbicide mixtures applied PP to control multiple herbicide-resistant (MHR) horseweed. The objective aim of this research was to ascertain the tolerance of white beans to tiafenacil herbicide mixtures and determine if MHR horseweed control with tiafenacil can be improved by adding herbicide partners in a surrogate soybean crop. During 2021 and 2022 four experiments w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are similar to other studies that have shown little injury in soybean or other market classes of dry bean with PP application of glyphosate + saflufenacil co-applied with metribuzin, bromoxynil, halauxifen-methyl or 2,4-D ester (Budd et al, 2016a(Budd et al, , 2016bMiller et al, 2012;Westerveld et al, 2021). In other studies, MHR Canada fleabane interference caused a soybean yield decrease of 41% (Soltani et al, 2023), 67% (Westerveld et al, 2021), 73% (Budd et al, 2016a), and 82% (Eubank et al, 2008). Furthermore, reduced MHR Canada fleabane interference with glyphosate + saflufenacil co-applied with metribuzin or 2,4-D ester resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control (Budd et al, 2016a(Budd et al, , 2016b.…”
Section: Mhr Canada Fleabane Control Studysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results are similar to other studies that have shown little injury in soybean or other market classes of dry bean with PP application of glyphosate + saflufenacil co-applied with metribuzin, bromoxynil, halauxifen-methyl or 2,4-D ester (Budd et al, 2016a(Budd et al, , 2016bMiller et al, 2012;Westerveld et al, 2021). In other studies, MHR Canada fleabane interference caused a soybean yield decrease of 41% (Soltani et al, 2023), 67% (Westerveld et al, 2021), 73% (Budd et al, 2016a), and 82% (Eubank et al, 2008). Furthermore, reduced MHR Canada fleabane interference with glyphosate + saflufenacil co-applied with metribuzin or 2,4-D ester resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control (Budd et al, 2016a(Budd et al, , 2016b.…”
Section: Mhr Canada Fleabane Control Studysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Effect of preplant glyphosate + saflufenacil herbicide mixtures on visible percent control, density and dry biomass of multiple herbicide-resistant Canada fleabane (MHRCF), soybean injury and yield at sites near Bothwell, Moraviantown and Ridgetown, ON in 2021 (n = 3) and 2022 (n = 2). Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different according to a Tukey-Kramer multiple range test at P < 0.05 a (Soltani et al, 2023). However, glyphosate + tiafenacil + bromoxynil tankmixes with metribuzin, halauxifen-methyl, or 2,4-D ester controlled MHR Canada fleabane 79, 76, and 78%, respectively (Soltani et al, 2023).…”
Section: Mhr Canada Fleabane Control Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation