2011
DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0b013e318216f1ec
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance, Safety, and Effect on the Faecal Microbiota of an Enteral Formula Supplemented With Pre‐ and Probiotics in Critically Ill Children

Abstract: The enteral formula supplemented with synbiotics was well tolerated by children in intensive care units; it was safe and produced an increase in faecal bacterial groups of previously reported beneficial effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GRV is one of the most routinely used parameters in the PICU despite a lack of evidence to support this parameter and current guidelines challenge the use of GRV as a marker for feeding intolerance . There is also no consensus for a standardised threshold for large GRV; however, the threshold of more than 50% of the feeding volume of the previous 4 h has been used in some studies and is the standard of care in our PICU . In the present study, gastric retention occurred in two infants receiving their feeding via a gastric route or a combined route and in one infant receiving EN via a post‐pyloric route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…GRV is one of the most routinely used parameters in the PICU despite a lack of evidence to support this parameter and current guidelines challenge the use of GRV as a marker for feeding intolerance . There is also no consensus for a standardised threshold for large GRV; however, the threshold of more than 50% of the feeding volume of the previous 4 h has been used in some studies and is the standard of care in our PICU . In the present study, gastric retention occurred in two infants receiving their feeding via a gastric route or a combined route and in one infant receiving EN via a post‐pyloric route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…On the contrary, EEN (control formula) in critically ill children did not influence bacterial diversity in stool following 7 days of therapy (by DGGE), but induced a trend for increase in Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species (sp) and a decrease in Bifidobacterium sp. and Enterobacteriaceae by standard culture methods (51). Therefore, it is currently difficult to make convincing conclusions about the effects of EEN on human intestinal microbiota composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simakachorn et al randomized 94 patients between 1 and 3 years old who were requiring mechanical ventilation to receive either a test formula containing a synbiotic blend (composed of 2 probiotic strains ( Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 and Bifidobacterium longum NCC 3001), fructooligosaccharides, inulin, and Acacia gum, or a control formula. Infants in the test group tolerated well pre- and pro biotics [75]. Faecal bifidobacteria and total lactobacilli were higher in the test group, whereas enterobacteria levels diminished.…”
Section: Pre- and Pro Biotics In Critically Ill Children: Availablmentioning
confidence: 99%