2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerancing from STL data: A Legacy Challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The meshing introduces specific inaccuracies due to rounding errors and the discretization of smooth curves, resulting in a characteristic tessellated surface. These errors inevitably lead to some uncertainty regarding the accurate size and position of features when extracting information from meshed solid data [31]. As Qiu et.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meshing introduces specific inaccuracies due to rounding errors and the discretization of smooth curves, resulting in a characteristic tessellated surface. These errors inevitably lead to some uncertainty regarding the accurate size and position of features when extracting information from meshed solid data [31]. As Qiu et.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the process is relatively straightforward for solid geometry, for porous geometries, the number of data points created increases exponentially in relation to feature size and porosity. This leads to significant challenges associated with pre-processing leading to alterations in the file format resolution, error fixing (bad edges, overlapping, intersecting triangles) and slicing parameter inconsistencies leading to print defects (Leirmo et al, 2020;Manmadhachary et al, 2016;Huotilainen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Copper-tungsten-silvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the process is relatively straightforward for solid geometry, for porous geometries, the number of data points increases exponentially in line with the resolution of the porous architecture required. This leads to significant challenges associated with preprocessing, leading to alterations in the file format resolution, error fixing (bad edges, overlapping and intersecting triangles) and slicing parameter inconsistencies leading to print defects when using the conventional technique (Leirmo et al, 2020;Huotilainen et al, 2014;Cuesta et al, 2020). The excellent agreement between predicted and actual data also shows the accuracy and consistency of the parameter informed technique, which is also a challenge when working with high-resolution STL files with large data points.…”
Section: Regulation and Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artifact was inspected and reoriented to aligned with Cartesian orthogonal axes using Microsoft 3D Builder and converted to binary format. The interested reader is referred to [35] and [36] for details on STL files and the challenges they impose on AM and tolerancing. The artifact is available online, along with all supplementary data.…”
Section: Designing the Test Artifactmentioning
confidence: 99%