“…Dean's 1994 experiment ( Where's My Biggest Performance Block? ), in which some 1,000 participants were asked to select the factor that “would enable you to do your job better,” confirmed Gilbert's ranking (Dean, , p. 52). The environmental factors controlled by the management of the organization, particularly Information (Data), have been considered most influential, with factors residing within the individual worker, such as knowledge (training), seen as less effective for improving performance.…”
Section: Performance Analysis In Emerging Marketsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…How does the ranking of importance for PI of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's () BEM—Information (Data), Resources (Instruments), Incentives, Knowledge, Capacity, and Motives, as identified in research of U.S. businesses by Gilbert () and Dean ()—compare with those of managers and nonmanagerial employees of a company in a business segment, the commercial banking sector, in Afghanistan, as an example of a newly developing market economy? Hypothesis : There is a difference in the ranking of the relative importance of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's BEM between the sampling of managers and nonmanagerial employees in a company the selected industry, commercial banking, in Afghanistan and those in the United States as evidenced by Gilbert () and Dean ().…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis : There is a difference in the ranking of the relative importance of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's BEM between the sampling of managers and nonmanagerial employees in a company the selected industry, commercial banking, in Afghanistan and those in the United States as evidenced by Gilbert () and Dean ().…”
This study explored the relevance of Thomas Gilbert's Behavior Engineering Model (BEM) in an emerging market environment. Gilbert's BEM has been a popular instrument for identifying factors affecting performance in the workplace. Its application has been generally consistent in ranking the relative importance of the six categories of factors for improving performance in the following order: Data (Information), Instruments (Resources), Incentives, Knowledge, Capacity, and Motives. The BEM, as a cause analysis model supporting the performance improvement (PI) process, was developed in the context of U.S. business organizations. PI practitioners have questioned whether the BEM would be applicable in a different cultural environment. This mixed methods case study of a commercial bank in Afghanistan found a different ranking of factors for improving performance, indicating Incentives, not Information, as most important. The results support the contention that culture matters and suggest the need to include economic conditions in the unique environmental context.
“…Dean's 1994 experiment ( Where's My Biggest Performance Block? ), in which some 1,000 participants were asked to select the factor that “would enable you to do your job better,” confirmed Gilbert's ranking (Dean, , p. 52). The environmental factors controlled by the management of the organization, particularly Information (Data), have been considered most influential, with factors residing within the individual worker, such as knowledge (training), seen as less effective for improving performance.…”
Section: Performance Analysis In Emerging Marketsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…How does the ranking of importance for PI of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's () BEM—Information (Data), Resources (Instruments), Incentives, Knowledge, Capacity, and Motives, as identified in research of U.S. businesses by Gilbert () and Dean ()—compare with those of managers and nonmanagerial employees of a company in a business segment, the commercial banking sector, in Afghanistan, as an example of a newly developing market economy? Hypothesis : There is a difference in the ranking of the relative importance of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's BEM between the sampling of managers and nonmanagerial employees in a company the selected industry, commercial banking, in Afghanistan and those in the United States as evidenced by Gilbert () and Dean ().…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis : There is a difference in the ranking of the relative importance of the six categories of variables in Gilbert's BEM between the sampling of managers and nonmanagerial employees in a company the selected industry, commercial banking, in Afghanistan and those in the United States as evidenced by Gilbert () and Dean ().…”
This study explored the relevance of Thomas Gilbert's Behavior Engineering Model (BEM) in an emerging market environment. Gilbert's BEM has been a popular instrument for identifying factors affecting performance in the workplace. Its application has been generally consistent in ranking the relative importance of the six categories of factors for improving performance in the following order: Data (Information), Instruments (Resources), Incentives, Knowledge, Capacity, and Motives. The BEM, as a cause analysis model supporting the performance improvement (PI) process, was developed in the context of U.S. business organizations. PI practitioners have questioned whether the BEM would be applicable in a different cultural environment. This mixed methods case study of a commercial bank in Afghanistan found a different ranking of factors for improving performance, indicating Incentives, not Information, as most important. The results support the contention that culture matters and suggest the need to include economic conditions in the unique environmental context.
“…In their performance consulting work, Stolovitch & Keeps () conducted activities similar to those of Dean () with similar results. “His results and ours coincide remarkably…Between 70 and 80 percent of people at work identify environmental factors as the greatest cause of why they do not perform better” (Stolovitch & Keeps, , pp.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, Deming and Juran examined where most opportunities for performance improvement occurred. Cox et al (), using a survey of MBA students, examined the perceived value of variables of performance based on Gilbert's () behavior engineering model, and Dean () examined performance blocks via an informal survey of workshop participants. As a result, performance practitioners have interpreted these results to fit the 85–15 rule.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
The purpose of this study was to examine the often touted but rarely quantified claims of where performance problems actually occur in organizations. Starting in the mid–20th century, organizational development and performance consultants have followed the belief that the vast majority of organizational problems (85%) are tied to variables controlled by the organization and only a small percentage (15%) of performance problems are attributed to the worker. This study is a meta‐analysis that examined 327 performance technology (PT) analysis projects and coded the recommendations according to PT models to quantify the ratio between organizational and individual performance recommendations and corresponding problems. We find broad support for the conventional wisdom regarding the ratio of organizational issues to individual workers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
