2022
DOI: 10.1080/10228195.2022.2122540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomorrow May Not Be Yours: Military Slang and Jargon as Linguistic Performance in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generic address terms were used discursively for the ideological construction of power and dominance which masculinity propagates. It is established that these sorts of masculine terms ascribe power and authority to social superiors and establish a sense of hierarchy and inequality because everyone is not licenced to use them reciprocally given the sense of hierarchy in the Army (Uwen and Mensah, 2022). In the same vein, the generic boy(s) as used by the Army to address male and female subordinate personnel, showed aspects of the regimented linguistic norms used among participants to construct masculine identity, subordination, controlled regimentation and indexation of social distance during interactions.…”
Section: Use Of Masculine Address Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generic address terms were used discursively for the ideological construction of power and dominance which masculinity propagates. It is established that these sorts of masculine terms ascribe power and authority to social superiors and establish a sense of hierarchy and inequality because everyone is not licenced to use them reciprocally given the sense of hierarchy in the Army (Uwen and Mensah, 2022). In the same vein, the generic boy(s) as used by the Army to address male and female subordinate personnel, showed aspects of the regimented linguistic norms used among participants to construct masculine identity, subordination, controlled regimentation and indexation of social distance during interactions.…”
Section: Use Of Masculine Address Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nigerian Army here, regimentally conceives masculinity as a symbolic attribute of male ruggedness, courage, and perseverance as ideologies that index the power dynamics that exist between soldiers and civilians. This is because the indexical features and ideologies of the Nigerian Army language practices are significant in the creation of a military persona and their inherent social beings (Uwen and Mensah, 2022). The choice of the heroic male persona in the tributes that form the formal discourses in funerals of members conventionally constructs the ideologies in the Army's language practices.…”
Section: Masculinisation Of Dead Personnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linguistic choices that express this stance and ascribe intelligence identity were derived from the participants' CofP. Uwen and Mensah [60] also demonstrate that such choices aim to exclude 'outsiders' from the vocabulary of identity that is prevalent in this community of practice. Stance here, is sufficiently established by the involvement of the stancetakers, the object of stance and stancetakers' position drawn from their knowledge of, and experiences in sexual relationships within the University social context.…”
Section: Love Induced By Good Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also used to enact inclusion and exclusion, thus to keep social "outsiders" from knowing some elements of a group's internal communication. Uwen and Mensah (2022) argue that both are symbolic linguistic resources which can be manipulated to serve specific group interests. Military jargon and slang are integral components of the linguistic exigencies devised by, and used for in-group communication, tactical operations, and strategic activities of militaries globally.…”
Section: Literature Review Jargon and Slang In The Militarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jargon and slang in the Nigerian Army are considered to make communication especially at the informal level more efficient; enhance solidarity and facilitate inclusion and exclusion. Uwen and Mensah (2022) propose that such language use sustains meaningful relationship between personnel, and provides a site to sanction the creativity of language. Access to the regimented environment of the army community of practice is usually an impediment to researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%