1998
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(1998)124:2(48)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomorrow's Civil Systems Engineer—The Master Integrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main limitations of the current general CEE curriculum is that it requires students to learn via courses whose relationships to one another and to the engineering process are not explained until late in a baccalaureate education (Bordogna 1998). In fact, most CEE curricula focus on developing specialized courses (Bonasso 2001) in spite of the fact that solving unique infrastructure problems in contemporary society requires a more holistic view to visualize alternative scenarios and to think in terms of large, complex systems.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Cee Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main limitations of the current general CEE curriculum is that it requires students to learn via courses whose relationships to one another and to the engineering process are not explained until late in a baccalaureate education (Bordogna 1998). In fact, most CEE curricula focus on developing specialized courses (Bonasso 2001) in spite of the fact that solving unique infrastructure problems in contemporary society requires a more holistic view to visualize alternative scenarios and to think in terms of large, complex systems.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Cee Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most CEE curricula focus on developing specialized courses (Bonasso 2001) in spite of the fact that solving unique infrastructure problems in contemporary society requires a more holistic view to visualize alternative scenarios and to think in terms of large, complex systems. Rather than a piecemeal approach, Bordogna (1998) advocated for a new philosophy to look at the problem as a whole and claimed that addressing this problem calls for a new focus on the integrative nature of engineering and on programs that train engineers as master integrators. Integrating a course into the curriculum that educates first-year or second-year students about general concepts of infrastructure systems can help provide this focus.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Cee Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineers recognize, through their professional code of ethics and licensing requirements, that they have a civic duty, akin to the medical profession, to “do no harm.” Nonetheless, the authors conclude that “… even as the complexity of the modern engineering project continues to mount … students are, on average taking 18 fewer technical credits in the curriculum today than in the 1920's.” In addition, students are taking more electives in their area of specialization, further diffusing the core curriculum. According to Bordogna (1998) and Cohon (2000), a well‐rounded fundamental education is no longer possible, and runs counter to the need for what many leading educators are calling for –“master integrators” and “master builders”– as the new attitude for the engineering profession. Russell and Stouffer (2005) conclude…”
Section: Engineering As the Core Of Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is precisely the opposite of what I think is needed, and is a view supported by many academicians. The experts (Smerdon 2000, Beder 1999, Bordogona 1998, Duderstadt 2008, National Research Council 2005) say that there are many trends and changes that will affect engineering and hence the educational processes need to change if the U.S. is to stay competitive:…”
Section: Engineering As the Core Of Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the impact of societal changes and demands of the public regarding the quality of higher education are also increasing (Yeung, 2006). The need to re-shape various aspects of the civil engineering curriculum to meet the challenge of increasing complexity and globalisation of civil engineering projects is being echoed by many prominent educators, practitioners and public administrators (Bordogna, 1998;Bowman and Farr, 2000;Boxall and Tait, 2008;Chau, 2007;Cheah et al, 2005;Chinowsky, 2002;Dudman and Wearne, 2003;Galloway, 2008;Jennings and Ferguson, 1996;Jha and Lynch, 2007;Koehn, 2004;Le and Tam, 2008;Li and Liu, 2005;Nehdi and Rehan, 2007;Russell and Stouffer, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%