Tomorrow’s ethics and today’s response: An investigation into the ways information systems professionals perceive and address emerging ethical issues

Determinants of Intention to Participate in Corporate BYOD-Programs – The Case of Digital Natives –

“…Prior research refers to the potential of BYOD to increase the stress level of employees (often referred to as BTechnostress^) (Fischer and Riedl 2017;Maier et al 2015;Niehaves et al 2012Niehaves et al , 2013Wakunuma and Stahl 2014;Yun et al 2012). The aforementioned authors state multiple reasons why BYOD may induce stress including: not being able to switch off from work anymore, blurring boundaries between private and work life, increased pressure to respond quickly, pressure to make decision quicker, etc.…”

“…IT consumerization is particularly evident in the lives of most young people in the developed world (Carter et al 2011) who were born into the digital age where technology such as smartphones, web-services, and social media is ubiquitous (Prensky 2001;Wakunuma and Stahl 2014). Members of this generation are frequently among the first to adopt IT-related innovations.…”

Using scenarios to understand the frontiers of IS: Fifteen years later (a postscript)

“…I later revised it to responsible innovation, a term discussed in the paper by Wakunuma and Stahl (2014). Either labeling is of course biased.…”

“…However, IoT, wrongly used, can result in privacy infringement, and loss of control, autonomy and self worth in the populace. For further discussion of the ethical implications of Ambient Intelligence, see the paper by Wakunuma and Stahl (2014) in this special issue. If the assertion above that these new technological developments have introduced a change in our research foci holds true, should IS also change its research paradigm?…”

“…Rather than being a passive conduit of the post hoc effect of information technology on various stakeholders, IS research should engage in active leadership. As stated by Markus and Mentzer (2014), Futures methodologies are most appropriate to investigate ethical issues in IS, while the article by Wakunuma and Stahl (2014) explores the lack of ethical conceptualization by IS professionals. By using Futures methodologies, IS can switch from being a passive observer of innovation to an active participant and true change agent in what von Schomberg (2011) termed responsible innovation.…”