2024
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tone Decay Reconsidered: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study in Hearing-Aid Users with Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss

Florian Herrmann Schmidt,
Thomas Hocke,
Lichun Zhang
et al.

Abstract: Among hearing aid (HA) users, there is a considerable variability in word recognition scores (WRSs). This variability is most pronounced among individuals with moderately severe to severe hearing loss. The variability cannot be adequately explained by factors such as pure-tone audiogram, audiogram type or age. This prospective study was designed to investigate the relationship between tone decay (TD) and WRS in a group of HA users with corresponding pure-tone hearing loss. The study population included 22 pati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, if those suggested interventions are implemented, improving one phoneme confusion error will deteriorate the other, and vice versa. Therefore, for poorer-performing CI-users, the outcomes of other test paradigms may be more informative, including tone-decay, a test which has been revisited in recent years and is more sensitive to retrocochlear lesions (Schmidt et al, 2024;Wasmann et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, if those suggested interventions are implemented, improving one phoneme confusion error will deteriorate the other, and vice versa. Therefore, for poorer-performing CI-users, the outcomes of other test paradigms may be more informative, including tone-decay, a test which has been revisited in recent years and is more sensitive to retrocochlear lesions (Schmidt et al, 2024;Wasmann et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%