Linguistic diversityHumans are unique not just for having language but for using over 6,500 distinct languages. A cursory glance at these languages shows pervasive diversity at every level of linguistic structure. Only around a dozen contrastive speech sounds (phonemes) are used by speakers of Rotokas (Papua New Guinea), while speakers of !Xóõ (Botswana) use over a hundred. Like other Khoisan languages, !Xóõ is remarkable for having click sounds as part of its phonological inventory-something rarely seen in other parts of the world. But there are also languages that exist without a single speech sound. There are perhaps 300 sign languages in use today that rely on the manual modality instead.Elementary notions expressed in the lexicon differ too. Only three basic color words are attested in Umpila (Cape York, Australia), while there are nearly a dozen in English (plus hundreds of secondary lexemes). To take another example, "drinking" (i.e., ingesting fluids) and "smoking" are conflated under a single verb, pii, in Punjabi (Pakistan and India); this contrasts with the verb khaa, for "eating" (i.e., ingesting solids). Speakers of Jahai (Malay Peninsula) do not have a generic verb for eating, however. Instead they must specify whether they gey (eat starchy food), h̃w (eat leafy greens), but (eat ripe fruit), or muc (eat animal).When it comes to combinatorics, the variation is no less striking. To indicate who did what to whom, some languages use word order (e.g., French) and others case marking (e.g., Finnish), while neither word order nor case marking will indicate the relations definitively in Riau Indonesian. Some languages put the subject of a sentence before the verb (e.g., English, Japanese), others the verb before the subject (e.g., Tagalog, in the Philippines, and Welsh), and yet others place the object before either (e.g., Hixkaryana, in Brazil). Sounds, meanings, and how they are combined vary from language to language.
Cognitive consequencesWhat are the consequences of this linguistic variation for cognition? According to many, nothing substantive. A founding postulate of modern-day anthropology-upheld by such venerable thinkers as Adolf Bastian, Edward B. Tylor, W. H. R. Rivers, and Claude Lévi-Strauss-is the "psychic unity" of humankind. Though many of these scholars were fervent upholders of linguistic and cultural diversity, they nevertheless subscribed to the doctrine of a universally shared mental endowment.