2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2015.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tonian granitic magmatism of the Borborema Province, NE Brazil: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Lages and Dantas () documented mafic and ultramafic rocks that present geochemical and isotopic characteristics compatible with arc‐root remnants and suprasubduction ophiolites of ~1.0 Ga, thus attesting to the orogenic nature of this event. Alternatively, based on specific trace element geochemistry, some studies such as those from Guimarães et al (, ), suggest that some coeval associations might have been emplaced via a within‐plate setting, being the nature of this the Cariris Velhos event still under debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Lages and Dantas () documented mafic and ultramafic rocks that present geochemical and isotopic characteristics compatible with arc‐root remnants and suprasubduction ophiolites of ~1.0 Ga, thus attesting to the orogenic nature of this event. Alternatively, based on specific trace element geochemistry, some studies such as those from Guimarães et al (, ), suggest that some coeval associations might have been emplaced via a within‐plate setting, being the nature of this the Cariris Velhos event still under debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Guimarães et al (2016), the majority of Tonian orthogneisses of the Borborema Province plot in the ferroan field in Frost et al (2001) SiO 2 x(FeO/FeO + MgO) diagram, specifically in the upper right part (SiO 2 > 70%) of the diagram. A scatter to the magnesian field is, however, evident, especially when using the SiO 2 x(FeOtot/FeOtot + MgO) diagram, recommended by Frost et al (2001) on the basis that most modern chemical analysis do not distinguish between ferric and ferrous iron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An alternative geotectonic model for the Cariris Velhos augen-gneisses was proposed by Neves (2003) and Guimarães et al (2012Guimarães et al ( , 2016, where those rocks would have been emplaced in an extensional, continental rift-related setting. It is interesting to notice that, interpreting similar lithogeochemical datasets, Neves (2003) and Guimarães et al (2012Guimarães et al ( , 2016) propose a distinct model and tectonic setting than Kozuch (2003), Santos et al (2010 and Caxito et al (2014b). This highlights the difficulty of using lithogeochemical data to infer the tectonic settings of ancient metaigneous rocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations