2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tonic, Phasic, and Integrator Components of Psychophysical Responses to Topical Capsaicin Account for Differences of Location and Sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may relate to inherent sex differences in the capsaicin response, with females having a greater sensitivity to capsaicin. This capsaicin‐sex difference has also been reported in humans . Additionally, the male rats in both treatment groups developed mechanical hyperalgesia when tested on the operant mechanical assay, but there was no difference in response between the cocoa‐ vs. control‐diet groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This may relate to inherent sex differences in the capsaicin response, with females having a greater sensitivity to capsaicin. This capsaicin‐sex difference has also been reported in humans . Additionally, the male rats in both treatment groups developed mechanical hyperalgesia when tested on the operant mechanical assay, but there was no difference in response between the cocoa‐ vs. control‐diet groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“… 90 Furthermore, variants implicated in the present phenotype have been found in the genes coding for GTP cyclohydrolase 1 ( GCH1 ), 8 for the melanocortin 1 receptor ( MC1R ) 16 or for the vasopressin receptor 1A ( AVPR1A ). 53 Furthermore, nongenetic factors play a role 40 up to the estimate that only 26% of the variance in heat pain responses can be explained by genetic factors. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Frot, Feine, and Bushnell (2004) demonstrated that the same topical capsaicin stimulus to the cheek or ankle elicits a greater response over time in females than in males. In a subsequent publication (Lariviere, McBurney, Frot, & Balaban, 2005), we applied our modeling approach to these data.…”
Section: Fit Of the Model To Existing Psychophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%