Tonotopic distribution and inferior colliculus projection pattern of inhibitory and excitatory cell types in the lateral superior olive of mice

Abstract

The principal neurons (PNs) of the lateral superior olive nucleus (LSO) are an important component of mammalian brainstem circuits that compare activity between the two ears and extract intensity and timing differences used for sound localization. There are two LSO PN transmitter types, glycinergic and glutamatergic, which also have different ascending projection patterns to the inferior colliculus (IC). Glycinergic LSO PNs project ipsilaterally while glutamatergic one's projections vary in laterality by species. In animals with good low‐frequency hearing (<3 kHz) such as cats and gerbils, glutamatergic LSO PNs have both ipsilateral and contralateral projections; however, rats that lack this ability only have the contralateral pathway. Additionally, in gerbils, the glutamatergic ipsilateral projecting LSO PNs are biased to the low‐frequency limb of the LSO suggesting this pathway may be an adaptation for low‐frequency hearing. To further test this premise, we examined the distribution and IC projection pattern of LSO PNs in another high‐frequency specialized species using mice by combining in situ hybridization and retrograde tracer injections. We observed no overlap between glycinergic and glutamatergic LSO PNs confirming they are distinct cell populations in mice as well. We found that mice also lack the ipsilateral glutamatergic projection from LSO to IC and that their LSO PN types do not exhibit pronounced tonotopic biases. These data provide insights into the cellular organization of the superior olivary complex and its output to higher processing centers that may underlie functional segregation of information.

Molecular and functional profiling of cell diversity and identity in the lateral superior olive, an auditory brainstem center with ascending and descending projections

“…pLSOs also give rise to contralateral, mainly glutamatergic projections terminating in the DNLL and CNIC ( Saint Marie et al, 1989 ; Saint Marie and Baker, 1990 ; Glendenning et al, 1992 ; Fredrich et al, 2009 ; Abraham et al, 2010 ). As recently reported, both projection types contribute relatively equally to the pLSO output in mice ( Haragopal et al, 2023 ).…”