2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too much ado about two-part models and transformation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
224
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
224
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of these models did not differ substantively from the gamma regression models. We only report the results of the gamma regression models because these results can be interpreted directly in terms of the original scale of the dependent variable (Buntin & Zaslavsky, 2004). In the series of gamma regression models, the first model included only demographic characteristics as explanatory variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of these models did not differ substantively from the gamma regression models. We only report the results of the gamma regression models because these results can be interpreted directly in terms of the original scale of the dependent variable (Buntin & Zaslavsky, 2004). In the series of gamma regression models, the first model included only demographic characteristics as explanatory variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs have thus been estimated using a one-model generalized linear model with link = log and gamma distribution [37]. A Conditional Logit Model was used for estimating OR and significance for comorbidity per added BMI point above 30.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a two-part model (23,24,25), first using simultaneous logistic regressions to determine whether treatment system (mental health or substance abuse treatment) was a significant predictor of utilization. We then conducted zero-truncated negative binomial regressions (26) to determine whether treatment system was a significant predictor of amounts of services received that were measured in number of days (counts).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%