2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too much of a good thing? Consumer response to strategic changes in brand image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Feeling empathy through the shared experience of the disadvantaged position is not difficult, and this drives the consumers' positive attitude toward the underdog (McGinnis et al, 2017). Thus, as discussed earlier, when value-related ethical transgressions (matching information) are committed, the symbolic positioning of the underdog brand may face critical judgments from consumers (Gaustad et al, 2019). The impact of functional transgressions (mismatching information) on the underdog brand positioning may be attenuated.…”
Section: Types Of Transgressions and Alignment With Brand Positioningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Feeling empathy through the shared experience of the disadvantaged position is not difficult, and this drives the consumers' positive attitude toward the underdog (McGinnis et al, 2017). Thus, as discussed earlier, when value-related ethical transgressions (matching information) are committed, the symbolic positioning of the underdog brand may face critical judgments from consumers (Gaustad et al, 2019). The impact of functional transgressions (mismatching information) on the underdog brand positioning may be attenuated.…”
Section: Types Of Transgressions and Alignment With Brand Positioningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another dimension strongly associated with opposition to breastfeeding in public was “breastfeeding in public is disgusting.” This is reminiscent of the strong negative views elicited by other breastfeeding practices, for example, milk sharing (Tomori et al, 2017; Tomori, Palmquist, & Dowling, 2016) and that reflect a broader disgust and distrust in human milk (Van Esterik, 2002). While difficult in practice, repositioning brand image and company reputation is a key function of marketing in the commercial sector (Gaustad, Samuelsen, Warlop, & Fitzsimons, 2019; Keller, 1999), which could prove effective in shifting negative public perceptions and attitudes in this context. The “Got Milk” campaign, for instance, which was developed for the California Milk Processor Board, is one example among many of how a strategically focused image based marketing intervention is able to transform deeply embedded associations held in consumer memory about a product and turnaround falling sales (Holt, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mitra and Jenamani (2020) the image of a brand is understood in the minds of consumers due to the kindness, strength and uniqueness of brand associations. Gaustad, Samuelsen, Warlop and Fitzsimons (2019) propose a theory of consumer response to changes that dampen or expand the associations that are central to brand image (due to brand acquisitions or repositioning). Current research examines the potential disadvantage of building brand associations that resonate with consumer identities and facilitate the interconnection of consumer brands.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%