Tool path accuracy enhancement through geometrical error compensation

Nojedeh, Mehrdad Vahebi; Habibi, Mohsen; Arezoo, Behrooz

doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.005

Cited by 67 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Final execution therefore aims to remove any remaining excess material. Iterative compensation is backed up by several studies to manage inherent measurement error [63][64][65][66][67][68]. …”

Section: Program Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and testing of an error compensation algorithm for photogrammetry assisted robotic machining

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Program Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and testing of an error compensation algorithm for photogrammetry assisted robotic machining

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As it is shown in Fig.1 [6,[14][15][16] and also by vector representation [1,17]. In modeling of kinematic error of a three-axis machine tool it is important to consider the effect of 21 kinematic errors, correctly.…”

Section: Kinematic Errors Of Z Axis Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinematic errors identification of three-axis machine tools based on machined work pieces

Pezeshki

Arezoo

2016

Precision Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…7,8 Most tool path generation researches focus on tool path strategy, 9 machining time reduction, 10 tool path optimization for achieving better machining quality 11,12 and so on. 13 In contrast with process planning, there are more researches on drive geometries.…”

Section: Tool Path Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drive geometry construction method of machining features for aircraft structural part numerical control machining

Wang

Tang

2014

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feature-based manufacturing methodologies offer opportunity for numerical control machining effectively and efficiently. However, the loss of drive geometries caused by the complex shape and machining process of aircraft structural parts undercuts the advantage of feature-based manufacturing tools. To better address the gap between the process planning and tool path generation for aircraft structural part, a drive geometry construction approach based on the topological relationships and machining process of machining features for process planning are proposed. The created drive geometries correspond with the optimized machining process. The drive geometries that define the machining areas of machining features are categorized into guide lines and guide faces in accord with the machining mode, such as 2.5-to 3-axis machining and multi-axis machining. In contrast to the traditional performing of intersection operations with a series of slice planes and the part model manually, the drive geometries are constructed by extracting the existing topological entities and creating some auxiliary topological entities automatically. The drive geometry preparing time and the consumption of computer memory are reduced significantly. The proposed approach has been tested and used in a pilot feature-based programming system that is developed for some aircraft manufacturers in China.

show abstract

Tool path accuracy enhancement through geometrical error compensation

Cited by 67 publications

References 21 publications

Development and testing of an error compensation algorithm for photogrammetry assisted robotic machining

Development and testing of an error compensation algorithm for photogrammetry assisted robotic machining

Kinematic errors identification of three-axis machine tools based on machined work pieces

Drive geometry construction method of machining features for aircraft structural part numerical control machining

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About