2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(00)00524-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear acceleration in relation to workpiece reinforcement percentage in cutting of metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in concentration of the SiC particles resulted in severe abrasive wear in the flank face of the tool. Similar observations are also reported by Xiaoping Li and Seah [31] and Fang et al [32] Xiaoping Li and Seah [31] and Fang et al [32] reported that, at this condition, the mechanism of wear in Al-SiC is abrasive and it is three-body abrasive wear. Further, they reported that the matrix at this condition is soft, and the SiC particles impacted by the tool cutting edge hit neighboring SiC particles and easily dislodge the particles.…”
Section: Microstructural Examination On the Chips And Tool Facessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increase in concentration of the SiC particles resulted in severe abrasive wear in the flank face of the tool. Similar observations are also reported by Xiaoping Li and Seah [31] and Fang et al [32] Xiaoping Li and Seah [31] and Fang et al [32] reported that, at this condition, the mechanism of wear in Al-SiC is abrasive and it is three-body abrasive wear. Further, they reported that the matrix at this condition is soft, and the SiC particles impacted by the tool cutting edge hit neighboring SiC particles and easily dislodge the particles.…”
Section: Microstructural Examination On the Chips And Tool Facessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At the same time, another part of the broken particle is carried into the chip by the matrix. [31] The fragments of the particles pushed by the tool edge are pressed in to the machined surface or fall out and are removed. The edge cuts the matrix again and the shear angle decreases.…”
Section: Microstructural Examination On the Chips And Tool Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers evaluated the mechanical properties (Rohatgi et al, 2002;Bienias et al, 2003;Zuoyong Dou et al, 2007), thermal properties , damping properties (Wu et al, 2006) and tribological properties (Surappa, 2008) with the use of fly ash as reinforcement in aluminum matrix composites (Senapati et al, 2015). However, these are difficult-to-machine materials due to the presence of very hard and brittle reinforcements, which also leads to their poor machinability involving high tool wear and surface imperfections (Li & Seah, 2001;Manna & Bhattacharyya, 2005). Sahoo et al (2013) presented the development of Al/SiCp (10%weight) metal matrix composite through a conventional casting process and studied its machinability characteristics in turning using multi-layer TiN coated carbide insert under dry environment based on Taguchi'sL9 orthogonal array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also found that in most cases, the tool wear was due to abrasion by the hard reinforcement particles in the matrix material (El-Gallab and Sklad, 1998a;Hung and Zhong, 1996;Davim, 2012;Luliano et al, 1998). Li and Seah (2001) found that the abrasive wear of the tool was accelerated when the percentage of the reinforcement in the MMC exceeded a critical value, which varies with the density and size of the reinforcement particles. Moreover, most of the studies about the machinability of MMC's were carried out using materials with ceramic particles with a size of 25 microns or larger, resulting in bad performance of the hard metal (WC) tools, (Durante et al, 1997;Muthukrishnan et al, 2008a;Muthukrishnan et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%