2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01663-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear condition monitoring based on a two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine using sound sensor for milling process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 2: Time domain, frequency domain, and time − frequency domain features are extracted from the original collected signal according to the definitions given in Table 1 [40,41], in which thee time − frequency domain features are the energy coefficients of the original collected signal by the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) [42,43].…”
Section: Tool Wear Estimation Methods Based On the Gapso-enhanced Elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 2: Time domain, frequency domain, and time − frequency domain features are extracted from the original collected signal according to the definitions given in Table 1 [40,41], in which thee time − frequency domain features are the energy coefficients of the original collected signal by the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) [42,43].…”
Section: Tool Wear Estimation Methods Based On the Gapso-enhanced Elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the field of machining authors have penalized ML models for predicting wear states in the last decades. They focus on predicting wear-related quality features of machined parts [27,28], quantifying wear of machining tools (Shen et al 2020;Zhou et al 2020) or predicting tool life [31]. In contrast, ML models for blanking processes are mainly used to describe discrete fault states, while the prediction and quantification of wear conditions is hardly found in recent literature.…”
Section: Data-driven Monitoring Of Blanking Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool wear is considered to be a key factor that dominates the surface quality and also a critical index to fulfill the accuracy requirements during the machining process [5]. Tool wear monitoring or estimating is usually divided into direct monitoring and indirect monitoring [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%