2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear identification and prediction method based on stack sparse self-coding network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were obtained from the industrial milling tool wear prediction dataset published by the American Fault Diagnosis and Health Management Association in 2010 [42]. The experimental platform was the CNC milling machine (Röders Tech RFM760).…”
Section: The First Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were obtained from the industrial milling tool wear prediction dataset published by the American Fault Diagnosis and Health Management Association in 2010 [42]. The experimental platform was the CNC milling machine (Röders Tech RFM760).…”
Section: The First Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting features on frequency domain can also be used to assess the cutting-tool wear conditions [27]. Therefore, extracting features from different domains in the raw signals can effectively increase the relevance to cutting-tool wear [28,29]. In this study, feature extraction was performed on the cleaned cutting force signals, with their expressions, as indicated in Table 4.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct method uses contact sensors or precision optical measuring instruments to directly obtain the tool wear shape for further analyze, with computer vision being a commen approch [12], [13]. This method provides accurate and intuitive wear information but requires stopping the machining process, which cannot be monitored in real-time [14]. Indirect measurement is a method to infer the tool state by measuring the sensor signal data, like vibration, force [15], secondary electron signals [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%