2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-022-1229-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear intelligent monitoring techniques in cutting: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of this heat generated in mechanical micro-drilling is conducted into the workpiece and tool; however, a portion remains in the chip [50]. A high temperature in the contact zone adversely affects thermally activated wear mechanisms, resulting in reduced tool life [51]. Thus, from the point of view of drill life, prior laser pre-drilling is advantageous.…”
Section: Energy In the Mechanical Drilling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this heat generated in mechanical micro-drilling is conducted into the workpiece and tool; however, a portion remains in the chip [50]. A high temperature in the contact zone adversely affects thermally activated wear mechanisms, resulting in reduced tool life [51]. Thus, from the point of view of drill life, prior laser pre-drilling is advantageous.…”
Section: Energy In the Mechanical Drilling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCM systems enable companies to indirectly monitor cutter conditions using various parameters such as temperature, vibration, and cutting forces [6]. In numerous investigations concerning the monitoring of tool wear through indirect measurement, the force sensor has emerged as the preferred choice among researchers due to its precision in detecting tool wear [7,8]. Nonetheless, the utilization of this sensor type is hindered by its high cost and impracticality within industrial settings [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across multiple research endeavors focused on indirectly measuring tool wear, the force sensor is preferred due to its precision in detecting tool wear [3,4]. Nonetheless, its cost and impracticality in industrial settings pose significant drawbacks [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%