2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06780-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear state prediction based on feature-based transfer learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, computer vision and feature extraction are continuously evolving and their popularity is increasing with the help of advanced technology [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, computer vision and feature extraction are continuously evolving and their popularity is increasing with the help of advanced technology [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature selection techniques can be categorized as follows [ 173 ]: Filter techniques are open-loop computational methods that only consider the relationship between features and class label without involving the subsequent tool wear classification model, as shown in Figure 6 . They evaluate the usefulness of features subsets based on their intrinsic properties using evaluation measures, such as dependency, consistency, or information, to eliminate low-ranking features [ 171 , 174 , 175 ]. The ranking measure is determined using statistical measures, such as Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the coefficient of determination, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), or analysis of variance ANOVA [ 171 , 174 , 176 , 177 , 178 ].…”
Section: Signal Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They evaluate the usefulness of features subsets based on their intrinsic properties using evaluation measures, such as dependency, consistency, or information, to eliminate low-ranking features [ 171 , 174 , 175 ]. The ranking measure is determined using statistical measures, such as Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the coefficient of determination, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), or analysis of variance ANOVA [ 171 , 174 , 176 , 177 , 178 ]. A detailed discussion on various performance measures is available in [ 179 ].…”
Section: Signal Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows for considerable efficiencies to be gained, as we are able to re-use much of the network, reducing the amount of data required, while obtaining similar accuracy. This approach significantly reduces the barriers to implementing many neural networks, and has successfully been applied in many different CNC applications [24] [19]. However, this approach has not been implemented using LSTM networks for anomaly detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%