2010
DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.154203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for Cellulose Analysis in Plant Cell Walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the vast number of plant and algal species, high-throughput screening methods, including Comprehensive Microarray Polymer Profiling (CoMPP) (84), OLIigosaccharide Mass Profiling (OLIMP) (91), and Fouriertransform infrared microspectroscopy (85), can be developed further to provide an initial step preceding more extensive characterization (103, 123). Immunocytochemistry using monoclonal antibodies and carbohydrate-binding modules (49) is also an extremely powerful technique as it enables in situ localization of wall components and, combined with specific wall treatments (76) or advanced microscopy such as electron tomography (92) and livecell imaging (44), additionally can indicate interactions between wall components in their native environment. and the involvement of the cell wall in these processes.…”
Section: Methods For Investigating Cell-wall Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the vast number of plant and algal species, high-throughput screening methods, including Comprehensive Microarray Polymer Profiling (CoMPP) (84), OLIigosaccharide Mass Profiling (OLIMP) (91), and Fouriertransform infrared microspectroscopy (85), can be developed further to provide an initial step preceding more extensive characterization (103, 123). Immunocytochemistry using monoclonal antibodies and carbohydrate-binding modules (49) is also an extremely powerful technique as it enables in situ localization of wall components and, combined with specific wall treatments (76) or advanced microscopy such as electron tomography (92) and livecell imaging (44), additionally can indicate interactions between wall components in their native environment. and the involvement of the cell wall in these processes.…”
Section: Methods For Investigating Cell-wall Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray diffraction (XRD) can provide a rough estimation of crystallinity through measuring the relative crystallinity index, which is based upon the proportions of crystalline and amorphous cell wall material, a measurement that can be influenced by non-cellulosic polysaccharides (L. Segal, 1959;Harris et al, 2010;Park et al, 2010;Harris et al, 2012). Cellulose crystallinity can also be assessed by 13 C solidstate NMR spectroscopy, by comparing the relative intensities of peaks that correspond to C4 atoms in the interior of the cellulose versus C4 atoms that are on the surface of the cellulose microfibril, which can be used to estimate crystallite size (Bootten et al, 2011;Dick-Perez et al, 2011).…”
Section: General Structure Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, many bacteria and various algae form linear arrays of multiple cellulose synthase catalytic subunits (CESAs), which synthesize ribbon-shaped microfibrils. Charophytes and land plants, instead, have hexameric CSCs, also referred to as rosettes, which produce elementary microfibrils with a cross section of around 3 nm and which can form higher order aggregates, depending on the cell types and the growth stage (Ding and Himmel, 2006;Harris et al, 2010). Recently, the crystal structure of the cellulose synthase subunit A (BcsA) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in complex with the accessory protein BcsB was solved (Morgan et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%