1959
DOI: 10.2307/973681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for Decision-Making in Resource Planning

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of governance decentralisation: The national policy on governance should allow decentralisation and self-governance at sub-national levels, as well as decision-making autonomy for non-state actors (Van Zeben, 2019;Bogason and Zølner, 2007;Ostrom, 1959Ostrom, , 1993. This first condition is a contextual one in the sense that the level and type of decentralisation is variable and, therefore, the way in which it is measured will also vary between territories or states.…”
Section: Territorial Rescaling and The Polycentricity Gap In Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of governance decentralisation: The national policy on governance should allow decentralisation and self-governance at sub-national levels, as well as decision-making autonomy for non-state actors (Van Zeben, 2019;Bogason and Zølner, 2007;Ostrom, 1959Ostrom, , 1993. This first condition is a contextual one in the sense that the level and type of decentralisation is variable and, therefore, the way in which it is measured will also vary between territories or states.…”
Section: Territorial Rescaling and The Polycentricity Gap In Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although beyond the scope of the 1961 article, their definition of polycentricity already underlines the need to empirically verify the types of relationships between the identified centers of decision-making. Vincent started this research in earlier work on urban governance and natural resource management, which was continued together with Lin and expanded further through the Workshop (Ostrom, 1953a(Ostrom, , 1953b(Ostrom, , 1959(Ostrom, , 1962a(Ostrom, , 1962bOstrom, Bish and Ostrom, 1988).…”
Section: Polycentricity Self-governance Federalism and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivation is multi-faceted, whereas the rationality assumption that underlies public choice models only captures one dimension of motivation 1997, 96-99). Similarly, Vincent found the benchmark of efficiency as externally imposed to have limited utility since individuals or communities may decide to prioritize other goals (Ostrom, 1959(Ostrom, , 1993.…”
Section: Polycentricity Self-governance Federalism and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the benefits of polycentric systems of governance is their ability to capture economies of scale, but Ostrom never presumed that this would be the only goal under consideration. In a polycentric order, individuals or communities might decide, for whatever reason, to sacrifice efficiency for the pursuit of other goals, such as accountability, fairness, or physical sustainability (Ostrom 1959, 1993).…”
Section: Present At the Creation Then Disappointment With Public Choicementioning
confidence: 99%