2021
DOI: 10.1116/5.0024062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for quantum network design

Abstract: Quantum networks will enable the implementation of communication tasks with qualitative advantages with respect to the communication networks known today. While it is expected that the first demonstrations of small scale quantum networks will take place in the near term, many challenges remain to scale them. To compare different solutions, optimize over parameter space, and inform experiments, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of concrete quantum network scenarios. Here, the authors review the state-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(297 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another scenario in which the completion time probability distribution is brought back to a known form includes the discarding of entanglement [35,36]. See [37] for a review of the completion time analysis for entanglement distribution schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another scenario in which the completion time probability distribution is brought back to a known form includes the discarding of entanglement [35,36]. See [37] for a review of the completion time analysis for entanglement distribution schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PEN states are those that can be generated by only distributing bipartite entanglement among different pairs of parties. Thus, they constitute a realistic class of multipartite states that are relatively simple to prepare, underlying the current investigations on quantum networks as platforms for quantum information processing [40]. Moreover, their convenient mathematical structure makes it possible to exploit the much better developed theory of bipartite entanglement in order to analyze the complex structure of entanglement in the multipartite scenario, as the proof of Theorem 2 further exemplifies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contrary to the set of biseparable states, the set of non-GNME is not closed under LOCC manipulation and relevant resources in this paradigm do not pass the GNME test. This is the case, for instance, of PEN states that underpin protocols held in quantum networks [40] (such as the star network in which a powerful central laboratory prepares entangled states for satellite nodes [41]). Indeed, if all parties share sufficient bipartite entanglement as to enable perfect teleportation any state of any given local dimension can be obtained from them and they are, therefore, universal resources in the standard paradigm of state manipulation under LOCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network end-nodes will comprise of a variety of QCs, heterogeneous in terms of base technology, and quantum sensing nodes. Many simulation tools are emerging as an effort to study how resources and applications are allo-cated in quantum network architectures [33][34][35] -see [36,Section 6] or [37] for a summary of related work. A major challenge to date involves developing high-efficiency and high-fidelity methods from matter qubits used primarily and processors and mobile qubits used in transfers.…”
Section: A Two Major Regimes In Quantum Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%