Integrating Biological Control Into Conservation Practice 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118392553.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools in action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 142 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite concerns about the non‐target effects of biological control agents (Barratt et al, 2010 ; Howarth, 2000 ; Simberloff, 2012 ), modern biological control programs implement a system of safe guards to reduce unwarranted damage to non‐target species—particularly when the agent is being introduced from a novel region through a practice known as classical biological control (Heinz et al, 2016 ; Messing, 2001 ). As a result, the use of biological control as an alternative to other labor and chemically intensive methods is increasingly becoming a part of both conservation and organic management practices (Baker et al, 2020 ; Van Driesche et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite concerns about the non‐target effects of biological control agents (Barratt et al, 2010 ; Howarth, 2000 ; Simberloff, 2012 ), modern biological control programs implement a system of safe guards to reduce unwarranted damage to non‐target species—particularly when the agent is being introduced from a novel region through a practice known as classical biological control (Heinz et al, 2016 ; Messing, 2001 ). As a result, the use of biological control as an alternative to other labor and chemically intensive methods is increasingly becoming a part of both conservation and organic management practices (Baker et al, 2020 ; Van Driesche et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%