1967
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6_part2.686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tooth Mobility: A Review of Clinical Aspects and Research Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,16 The effects of RAP can diminish with a decrease in tooth movement velocity over time, although the effects have been reported to last for approximately 4 months. 14,17 Elastomeric chains can be preferred for space closures. 10 Dixon et al 10 studied power chains and nickel titanium coil springs and concluded that although coil springs gave more rapid tooth movement, power chains were effective on space closure and they were a cheaper option for orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,16 The effects of RAP can diminish with a decrease in tooth movement velocity over time, although the effects have been reported to last for approximately 4 months. 14,17 Elastomeric chains can be preferred for space closures. 10 Dixon et al 10 studied power chains and nickel titanium coil springs and concluded that although coil springs gave more rapid tooth movement, power chains were effective on space closure and they were a cheaper option for orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-and postdistalization mobility scores and gingival indices for the canines were also evaluated and scored. The Muhleman's index was used to assess mobility in our study 14 as per the following scoring system: 0, no mobility; 1, .0.5 and ,1 mm of mobility buccolingually; 2, .1 mm and ,2 mm of mobility buccolingually; 3, .2 mm of mobility buccolingually; and 3+, both vertical and buccolingual mobility. In the current study, the Silness and Loe gingival index was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tip of the tooth at the measured site was used as the reference point for these measurements. Furthermore, tooth mobility was also calculated using Muhleman's mobility index (43) as follows: 0 ϭ no mobility; 1 ϭ Ͼ0.5 and Ͻ1 mm mobility buccolingually; 2 ϭ Ͼ1 mm but Ͻ2 mm mobility buccolingually; 3 ϭ Ͼ2 mm mobility buccolingually; 3ϩ ϭ both vertical and buccolingual mobility.…”
Section: Morphometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, mobility values may fluctuate during the day. 5,20 With these factors in mind, tooth mobility for ten selected control subjects was measured three times, with a 24 hour-interval between recordings, and then values were analyzed according to Dahlberg's formula. 21 As a result, the method error was low (PTV = 1.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%