Top-Cited Articles in Implant Dentistry

Fardi, Anastasia; Kodonas, Konstantinos; Lillis, Theodoros; Veis, Alexander

doi:10.11607/jomi.5331

Cited by 58 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to this, all the top 50 articles in this study can be regarded as “classic” articles. This study revealed that the citation counts of articles published in the Dental Traumatology is higher than the collective citation counts of endodontics including regenerative endodontics as well as dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology and less than periodontology, implant dentistry, and orthodontics . Generally, it is believed that citation rates can fluctuate based on the number of researchers in that particular specialty .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…[7][8][9] Furthermore, citation analysis recognizes the significant contributions of particular authors, institutions, countries, and journals within a specific scientific community. [10][11][12] Bibliometric citation analysis has been performed in medicine including the topics of ophthalmology, 13 orthopedic surgery, 14 orthopedic oncology, 15 orthopedic elbow surgery, 16 urology, 17 surgery, 18 emergency medicine, 19,20 respiratory system, 21 pituitary adenoma, 22 osteosarcoma, 22 gastric cancer, 23 hepatocellular carcinoma, 24 inflammatory bowel diseases, 25 tuberculosis, 26 headache disorders, 27 asthma 28 as well as in dentistry 29 including the sub-specialties of pediatric dentistry, 30 endodontics, 31 regenerative endodontics, 32,33 dental, oral and maxillofacial traumatology, 34 oral and maxillofacial surgery, 35 implant dentistry, 36 orthodontics, 37,38 periodontology, 39 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), 5 oral leukoplakia, 12 squamous cell carcinoma, 40 cleft lip and palate, 4 ameloblastoma, 41 pre-malignant oral lesions, 42 and oral submucous fibrosis. 43 To the authors' knowledge, no study has been performed to identify and analyze the top 50 most cited articles published in a specific professional journal related to Dental Traumatology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

Ahmad

Abbott

Alam

et al. 2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims The impact of a scientific article in its respective field is reflected by its citation count. The purpose of this review was to conduct a citation analysis in order to identify and analyze the top 50 most cited articles published in Dental Traumatology since its inception in order to highlight the contribution of the journal to the field of Dental Traumatology. Methods Elsevier's Scopus was used to search and analyze the 50 most frequently cited scientific papers. After the screening process, two reviewers arranged the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts. Each article was then cross‐matched with Google Scholar. The articles were analyzed, and information including citation counts, citation density, publication year, authorship, contributing institutions and countries, article topic, study design, and keywords was extracted. Results The literature search identified 2421 articles. The citation counts of the 50 selected articles varied from 117 to 580 (Scopus) and 206 to 1130 (Google Scholar). The year in which most top 50 articles were published was 2002 (n = 5). Among 105 authors, the greatest contribution was made by JO Andreasen (n = 12). Most of the articles originated from the United States (n = 12) with the greatest contributions from the University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark (n = 6). Original research article was the most frequent study design (n = 34). The majority of the top 50 articles were focused on traumatic dental injuries. Among 131 unique key words, root resorption (n = 6) was the most frequently used. A non‐significant correlation occurred between citation count (correlation coefficient = 0.127, P = .378), citation density (correlation coefficient = 0.654, P = 2.493), and publication age. Conclusions This study identified the top 50 most cited articles published in this journal in the specialty of Dental Traumatology. The publication year of an article was not significantly associated with citation count nor citation density.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

Ahmad

Abbott

Alam

et al. 2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…) and in implant dentistry journals (Fardi et al . ). The probable reason could be due to a greater number of scientist/researchers and sufficient funds for conducting the research (Fardi et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The probable reason could be due to a greater number of scientist/researchers and sufficient funds for conducting the research (Fardi et al . ). Several institutions in the United States published highly cited manuscripts such as Loma Linda University, UTHSCSA, and University of North Carolina among others.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

What is of interest in Endodontology? A bibliometric review of research published in the International Endodontic Journal and the Journal of Endodontics from 1980 to 2019

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To report the most common terminology used in titles of scientific papers published in the International Endodontic Journal (IEJ) and Journal of Endodontics (JOE) between 1980 and 2019 and to identify the most‐cited papers in these journals. Methodology The Web of Science database was searched to retrieve all the manuscripts published in the IEJ and JOE between 1980 and 2019. The articles were analysed using the VOS viewer software and the terms within the titles extracted. The top‐10 terms were categorized according to the number of occurrences and the decade of publication. Maps were created using the text data for each decade of publication. Classic papers were identified when the number of citations was >400. During the same period of time, highly cited studies were identified including the authors, institutions and countries associated with these papers. Results Terms such as canal, molar and periapical lesion were the most commonly used in titles between 1980 and 1999. The terms instruments, expression, case report and cell were the most often terms used between 2000 and 2019. During the last 10 years, an increase in the number of reviews and papers on cone beam computed tomography occurred. The organizations with the largest number of citations in each decade were University of São Paulo, University College London, Loma Linda University and United States Army. The country with the largest number of citations and greatest number of top 10 and top 100 manuscripts was the United States. A paper had to be associated with more than 167 citations to be included in the top‐100 most‐cited list; at least 14 papers met the criteria to be categorized as a citation classic (>400 citations). Conclusion While many diverse areas of endodontics have been explored in the last 40 years within the IEJ and JOE, only a relatively few topics are highly cited and can be considered as classics.

show abstract

“…Generally, a scientific article on a list of the most frequently cited papers in its respective field suggests that it has achieved a landmark (Tarazona et al 2018). In theory, the recognition of a research article within the scientific community (citation count) and how it influences the understanding of a disease and/or its management as well as whether it gives rise to new research trends, reflects its quality (Fardi et al 2017). Thus, when a research article manages to secure its position in the list of 'classic' articles in a specific field, it confirms that the international clinical and scientific communities have acknowledged both the paper and the journal as having made a considerable contribution to the area of expertise.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To identify and analyse the main features of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals from 1961 to 2018. Methodology The Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science ‘All Databases’ was used to search and analyse the 100 most frequently cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses having ‘randomized’, ‘randomised’, ‘randomized controlled’, ‘randomised controlled’, ‘randomized controlled trial’, ‘randomized controlled trials’, ‘clinical trial’, ‘systematic’, ‘systematic review’, ‘meta‐analysis’, and ‘meta‐analyses’ in the title section. The ‘International Endodontic Journal’, ‘Journal of Endodontics’, ‘Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology’, ‘Australian Endodontic Journal’, ‘Endodontics & Dental Traumatology’, ‘Endo‐Endodontic Practice Today’ and ‘European Endodontic Journal’ were included in the publication name section. After ranking the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts, each article was cross‐matched with the citation counts in Elsevier's Scopus and Google Scholar. The articles were analysed, and information on citation counts, citation density, year of publication, contributing authors, institutions and countries, journal of publication, study design, topic of the article and keywords was extracted. Results The citation counts of the 100 most‐cited articles varied from 235 to 20 (Web of Science), 276 to 17 (Scopus) and 696 to 1 (Google Scholar). The year in which the top 100 articles were published was 2010 (n = 13). Among 373 authors, the greatest number of articles was associated with three individuals namely Reader A (n = 5), Beck M (n = 5) and Kvist T (n = 5). Most of the articles originated from the United States (n = 24) with the greatest contribution from Ohio State University (USA) (n = 5). Randomized controlled trials were the most frequent study design (n = 45) followed by systematic reviews (n = 30) with outcome studies of root canal treatment being the major topic (n = 35). The Journal of Endodontics published the largest number of included articles (n = 70) followed by the International Endodontic Journal (n = 27). Among 259 unique keywords, meta‐analysis (n = 23) and systematic review (n = 23) were the most frequently used. Conclusion This study has revealed that year of publication had no obvious impact on citation count. The bibliometric analysis highlighted the quantity and quality of research, and the evolution of scientific advancements made in the field of Endodontology over time. Articles before 1996, that is prior to the CONSORT statement that encouraged authors to include specific terms in the title and keywords, may not have been included in this electronic search.

show abstract

Top-Cited Articles in Implant Dentistry

Cited by 58 publications

References 29 publications

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

What is of interest in Endodontology? A bibliometric review of research published in the International Endodontic Journal and the Journal of Endodontics from 1980 to 2019

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About