1994
DOI: 10.1109/52.300121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-down vs. bottom-up process improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We extended a well-known modelling method (Sargent 2005) with the concept of a bottom up approach for developing a conceptual model (Thomas et al 1994). We built further on the notion of actor model for organisations (Hewitt 2010) to come up with an executable/simulatable model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We extended a well-known modelling method (Sargent 2005) with the concept of a bottom up approach for developing a conceptual model (Thomas et al 1994). We built further on the notion of actor model for organisations (Hewitt 2010) to come up with an executable/simulatable model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-centric approach makes use of sophisticated AI algorithms over past data to predict future consequences of a course of action. The model-centric approaches come in two categories namely top-down or bottom-up (Thomas et al 1994). Top-down approach considers a reductionist view (Beckermann et al 1992) wherein global state and overall system behaviour contribute to conceptualise a system.…”
Section: Design and Analysis Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specification and analysis of complex systems can be approached top-down or bottom-up [11]. A top-down approach conceptualises a system using a global state and the behaviour represented using an aggregated macro-behaviour of the system elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%