Top Incomes in the Long Run of History

Abstract

A recent literature has constructed top income shares time series over the long run for more than twenty countries using income tax statistics. Top incomes represent a small share of the population but a very significant share of total income and total taxes paid. Hence, aggregate economic growth per capita and Gini inequality indexes are sensitive to excluding or including top incomes. We discuss the estimation methods and issues that arise when constructing top income share series, including income definition and comparability over time and across countries, tax avoidance, and tax evasion. We provide a summary of the key empirical findings. Most countries experience a dramatic drop in top income shares in the first part of the twentieth century in general due to shocks to top capital incomes during the wars and depression shocks. Top income shares do not recover in the immediate postwar decades. However, over the last thirty years, top income shares have increased substantially in English speaking countries and in India and China but not in continental European countries or Japan. This increase is due in part to an unprecedented surge in top wage incomes. As a result, wage income comprises a larger fraction of top incomes than in the past. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and empirical models that have been proposed to account for the facts and the main questions that remain open

The Role of Technological Change in Income Inequality in the United States

“…The slumps in income in the first half of the century occurred due to the severe economic shocks that followed World War I and the Great Depression. Many businesses were destroyed, leaving their owners deprived of high incomes (Atkinson, Piketty and Saez, 2011). The years after World War II were accompanied by a continuous drop in the curves.…”

Lessons from history for the future of work

“…Inequality is an area that has seen much recent research, with large data sets assembled and interrogated. Some scholars have focused on the share of total income going to the top 1% or 5% 10 . Others use indices that incorporate information from every level of the income distribution 11 .…”

Income Inequality Generates Chaos

“…Studies on income inequality, which progressed with masterpieces being series of empirical researches by Thomas Piketty and his colleagues ( [1]- [8] etc. ), have entered a new stage since [9] showed the appropriate income distribution by developing a theoretical framework to complement the empirical researches and bridge the wide conceptual gulf that exists between economics, which assumes rational agents who maximize their utility or profit, and econophysics, which assumes purpose-free agents who act randomly with near zero intelligence as [10] showed.…”