2009
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200810185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TopBP1 and DNA polymerase-α directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks

Abstract: TopBP1 and the Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 (9-1-1) complex activate the ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase at stalled replication forks. ATR is recruited to stalled forks through its binding partner, ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP); however, it is unclear how TopBP1 and 9-1-1 are recruited so that they may join ATR–ATRIP and initiate signaling. In this study, we use Xenopus laevis egg extracts to determine the requirements for 9-1-1 loading. We show that TopBP1 is required for the recruitme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
150
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using yeast and DT40 cells indicate that PCNA ubiquitination and pol are not required for ongoing replicon movement in UV-irradiated cells but instead play an important role in preventing accumulation of ssDNA gaps behind the replication fork (45,46). Details of the putative re-priming mechanism that maintains leading strand synthesis on damaged templates are not well understood (47). Nevertheless, if the basic mechanisms of TLS are conserved in yeast, chicken (DT40), and mammalian cells and if TLS does indeed occur post-replicatively, it appears likely that Rad18-dependent activation of FA pathway is initiated behind re-primed replication forks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using yeast and DT40 cells indicate that PCNA ubiquitination and pol are not required for ongoing replicon movement in UV-irradiated cells but instead play an important role in preventing accumulation of ssDNA gaps behind the replication fork (45,46). Details of the putative re-priming mechanism that maintains leading strand synthesis on damaged templates are not well understood (47). Nevertheless, if the basic mechanisms of TLS are conserved in yeast, chicken (DT40), and mammalian cells and if TLS does indeed occur post-replicatively, it appears likely that Rad18-dependent activation of FA pathway is initiated behind re-primed replication forks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth ATR regulator, the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, acts at ssDNA/dsDNA junctions in Xenopus extracts and binds RPA-ssDNA in human cells (Olson et al 2007b;Oakley et al 2009;Duursma et al 2013;Shiotani et al 2013). Both 9-1-1 and MRN interact with TopBP1, an activator of ATR-ATRIP, enabling it to stimulate the ATR kinase on DNA (Kumagai et al 2006;Delacroix et al 2007;Mordes et al 2008;Yan and Michael 2009;Dunphy 2010, 2013;Liu et al 2011;Duursma et al 2013). Through a process that is still not fully elucidated, activated ATR recognizes Chk1 with the help of mediators (e.g., Claspin, Timeless, and Tipin), allowing activation of the ATR-Chk1 kinase cascade (Kumagai and Dunphy 2003;Kumagai et al 2004;UnsalKac xmaz et al 2005UnsalKac xmaz et al , 2007Chou and Elledge 2006;Wang et al 2006;Smith et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Somewhat contradictory, TopBP1 has been shown to localize to stalled replication forks independently of the 9-1-1 complex, and rather be responsible for recruitment of 9-1-1. 38,39 In line with this, recruitment of TopBP1 to ATR activating DNA structures in Xenopus extracts was shown to rely on the MRN complex. The MRN-mediated recruitment seemed to depend on TopBP1 BRCT3-6.…”
Section: Topbp1 Is Required For Atr Activationmentioning
confidence: 75%