2010
DOI: 10.1177/0192623310371221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topic of Histopathology Blinding in Nonclinical Safety Biomarker Qualification Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histopathology examination was conducted according to published best practices (Burkhardt et al 2010; Crissman et al 2004). A board-certified veterinary pathologist performed an initial assessment with full knowledge of the treatment groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histopathology examination was conducted according to published best practices (Burkhardt et al 2010; Crissman et al 2004). A board-certified veterinary pathologist performed an initial assessment with full knowledge of the treatment groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the trial with the largest degree of observer bias 11 used a scale reported to have an intraclass correlation coefficient as high as 0.87. 40 Some researchers consider the blinding of outcome assessors too resource-demanding, superfluous, or misconceived; 41,42 however, planning and running a randomized clinical trial is already a logistically very challenging undertaking. The comparatively minor investment of using blinded outcome assessors reduces the risk of bias considerably.…”
Section: Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various consortia and working groups composed of professionals from industry, academia, and government institutions have undertaken or are undertaking nonclinical work to qualify safety biomarkers of tissue injury, function, and repair. Multiple groups have been working in parallel, and participants have developed a combination of questions, answers, and opinions with regard to study execution or preferred practices to achieve study end points (Burkhardt et al 2010). Qualitative histopathology serves as a benchmark in these biomarker studies, since it is often the technique used to ultimately identify the pathologic process for which the biomarker is being developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%