2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical epidermal growth factor spray for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the key highlight of our study. In this study, the follow-up duration was 12 weeks because many previous similar clinical trials for diabetic wound healing also used 12 weeks for the follow-up duration (13,14,18,(32)(33)(34)(35). For precise assessment of the efficacy of the allogeneic ASC treatment, we excluded external confounding factors that could have affected the treatment such as vascular insufficiency and infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the key highlight of our study. In this study, the follow-up duration was 12 weeks because many previous similar clinical trials for diabetic wound healing also used 12 weeks for the follow-up duration (13,14,18,(32)(33)(34)(35). For precise assessment of the efficacy of the allogeneic ASC treatment, we excluded external confounding factors that could have affected the treatment such as vascular insufficiency and infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both intralesional injections and sprays decrease the transmission time of growth factor into the wound tissue. Recently, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical study assessing efficiency of an EGF spray applied topically twice a day to DFUs showed increased healing compared to control treated with saline spray, with complete healing rates of 73.2% and 50.6% respectively [69]. In two phase III clinical trials, a spray containing 0.01% bFGF was used to treat DFU, but failed to meet the primary outcome of difference in complete healing over 12 weeks compared to the control group (NCT01217476 and NCT01217463).…”
Section: Growth Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large RCT of 167 patients, topical spray treatment with 0.005% rhEGF was found to significantly improve complete ulcer healing at 12 weeks (I: 73.2% vs C: 50.6%, P = .001) and the time required to achieve 50% ulcer area reduction. 101 We also found a small cohort study from 2012, deemed to be at a high risk of bias, which found no difference in healing at 8 weeks following weekly application of topical EGF compared with salinemoistened gauze. 102 One three-arm cohort study reported a higher wound closure index at 6 weeks with the use of EGF or platelet-derived growth factor when compared with placebo but was at a high risk of bias with incomplete reporting of results, and the duration of ulcers, at a mean of 8.9 days at inclusion, was relatively short.…”
Section: Epidermal Growth Factormentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Unfortunately, this latter study was marred by switching those in the control group to the intervention arm after the first 2 weeks. In a large RCT of 167 patients, topical spray treatment with 0.005% rhEGF was found to significantly improve complete ulcer healing at 12 weeks (I: 73.2% vs C: 50.6%, P = .001) and the time required to achieve 50% ulcer area reduction . We also found a small cohort study from 2012, deemed to be at a high risk of bias, which found no difference in healing at 8 weeks following weekly application of topical EGF compared with saline‐moistened gauze .…”
Section: Growth Factors Cellular Products and Cellsmentioning
confidence: 67%