2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1250-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical silver sulfadiazine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation for breast cancer

Abstract: SSD cream reduced the severity of radiation-induced skin injury compared with general skin care alone. Further studies in patients with other types of cancer and also comparing SSD cream with other topical agents are warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
2
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
62
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients who applied topical agents such as hyaluronic acid, calendula, trolamine, silver sulfadiazine, and moisturizing durable barrier cream, the reported rates of maximum grade 4, 3, 2, and 1 radiation dermatitis were ranged 0-2%, 0-35%, 41-63%, and 2-50%, respectively. In patients who received general supportive skin care, the reported rates of maximum grade 4, 3, 2, and 1 radiation dermatitis were ranged 0-2%, 3-53%, 32-63%, and 6-58%, respectively (Fisher et al, 2000;Fenig et al, 2001;Pommier et al, 2004;Leonardi et al, 2008;Hemati et al, 2012;Pinnix et al, 2012;Graham et al, 2013). In our study, maximum grade 4 radiation dermatitis did not develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients who applied topical agents such as hyaluronic acid, calendula, trolamine, silver sulfadiazine, and moisturizing durable barrier cream, the reported rates of maximum grade 4, 3, 2, and 1 radiation dermatitis were ranged 0-2%, 0-35%, 41-63%, and 2-50%, respectively. In patients who received general supportive skin care, the reported rates of maximum grade 4, 3, 2, and 1 radiation dermatitis were ranged 0-2%, 3-53%, 32-63%, and 6-58%, respectively (Fisher et al, 2000;Fenig et al, 2001;Pommier et al, 2004;Leonardi et al, 2008;Hemati et al, 2012;Pinnix et al, 2012;Graham et al, 2013). In our study, maximum grade 4 radiation dermatitis did not develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Numerous studies using different compounds such as corticosteroid, aloe vera, hyaluronic acid, sucralfate, biafine, moisturizing durable barrier cream, ascorbic acid, silver sulfadiazine, and calendula have been performed to identify a topical agent that prevents or minimizes the acute radiation dermatitis, but the results of most studies were negative or contradictory (Halperin et al, 1993, Williams et al, 1996, Fisher et al, 2000, Bostrom et al, 2001, Schmuth et al, 2002, Pommier et al, 2004, Merchant et al, 2007, Kirova et al, 2011, Hemati et al, 2012, Pinnix et al, 2012, Graham et al, 2013. A few topical agents demonstrated a superior efficacy in preventing acute radiation dermatitis in randomized phase Ⅲ trials (Schmuth et al, 2002, Pommier et al, 2004, however, there is no general agreement on the gold-standard approach for prevention or minimization of acute radiation dermatitis, and clinical practice seems to be varied across countries and institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists the randomized studies on the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions in patients with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy in last 5 years. 4,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Randomized controlled studies have generated mostly negative results for use of skin care products in preventing or treating radiation dermatitis. Remarkably, patients receiving topical corticosteroids (mometasone furoate and betamethasone) during radiotherapy might experience reduced acute skin toxicity compared with placebo or moisturizing creams according to the result of three doubleblind studies with a larger population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silver sulfadiazine cream was shown to be active in preventing radio-dermatitis [112,113], but its use as prophylactic management is not recommended because of concerns about sensitivity or resistance with overuse [109,114].…”
Section: Preventive Hygienic Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%